15

The following sentence means "seeing all the different foreign people was interesting."

This, according to my Japanese friends is incorrect:

色々な外国人を見ているは面白かった。

... and this is correct:

色々な外国人を見ているのは面白かった。

To me, the difference is so subtle that I can't really get a feel for how the presence of の really changes it.

Can someone provide an explanation that clarifies what makes の important in this situation?

Update: I'm actually still confused by this. Couldn't the first example mean "Looking at the various foreigners was interesting", and the second example mean "That I was looking at the various foreigners was interesting"?

Improve this question

4 Answers 4

Reset to default
11

In this case, 「の」 changes the verb "to [be] see" into the gerund form "[be] seeing", which is what you found interesting. After that, 「は」 is just 「は」.

Improve this answer
8
  • 1
    Isn't it already in the gerund just by having ている?
    – Louis Waweru
    Commented Jun 19, 2011 at 6:51
  • 1
    Ah, I misunderstood the gerund, nevermind.
    – Louis Waweru
    Commented Jun 19, 2011 at 7:10
  • 2
    I think that the notation “[be] seeing” is confusing because it suggests that it is a progressive form instead of a gerund. It is probably better to just write “seeing.”
    – Tsuyoshi Ito
    Commented Jun 19, 2011 at 15:17
  • 1
    A "gerund" is a verb that has been changed it into a noun that identifies the action the verb represents. "swim" -> "swimming", "look" -> "looking", etc.
    – Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
    Commented Jun 20, 2011 at 5:14
  • 1
    English lacks the granularity to translate the 「～ている」 conjugation properly; translating it as "to be Xing" is the closest equivalent in English, but it is not actually the gerund.
    – Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
    Commented Jun 20, 2011 at 7:29
11

By putting "の", your are making a nominal group from the proposition that precedes it, and you put the focus on the action (there is a nuance with "こと", which takes practice to feel). Then, since you made a nominal group, you need your usual particles after, such as は、 に、 or whatever is required.

Examples:
ケーキを食べるのが好きです。
I like to be eating a cake. (The fun is in the eating.)

ケーキを食べることが好きです。
I like to eat cakes. (Generality. I like cakes.)

外で子供が遊んでいるのにじゃまされました。
I have been disturbed by children playing outside. (The playing is the reason of the disturbance)

Improve this answer
1
  • One sounds like what you want to do now and the other like a description of your tastes. Is that right or that's just pure coincidence?
    – Pablo
    Commented Sep 20, 2018 at 21:47
5

we use の when we are talking about the verb. It is like "to" or "-ing" in English.

Improve this answer
5

Actually both forms are correct. の is a recent development in Japanese, before it appeared, you'd use the 連体形(行く/熱い/綺麗な[る]/食べた[る]) directly before particles. An example can be seen here:

今宵は夜毎にこゝに集ひ來る骨牌（かるた）仲間も「ホテル」に宿りて、舟に殘れる*は*余一人のみなれば。

森鴎外　「舞姫」

You should still use の, though.

Improve this answer
4
  • 2
    Nowadays, the omission of の is rather for verse i.e. writing stories, poems, etc.
    – syockit
    Commented Jul 15, 2011 at 15:02
  • @syockit, that's true, but I've noticed some contemporary people clearly omitting の when speaking(no ん no nothing). What I don't know is whether that's because of pedantry or because of their dialect. I'd say it's the former.
    – user145
    Commented Sep 1, 2011 at 2:32
  • 2
    I don't know if it's called pedantry, but in speech, it's usually used in dramatic/empathic(emotional) sentences, like when complaining someone's behavior, or feeling sorry for a sad incident, etc.
    – syockit
    Commented Sep 2, 2011 at 6:46
  • 2
    (In modern Japanese) zero-nominalization is common in some particular constructs (see japanese.stackexchange.com/questions/4489/…), but not in others. Omitting の in the example sentence will definitely mark you as a non-native speaker.
    – dainichi
    Commented Feb 28, 2012 at 1:29

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .