Nuance of request to replace ramen cups

Question

In an N2 mock paper, the following letter was given, with a very confusing sentence within (bolded below). The answer was 1, but several native Japanese people I asked were confident it was 2.

• Which is correct?
• What is the nuance of the bolded sentence - to change all 200 ramen cups (option 1) or only the defective ones (option 2)?

以下は、伊{い}藤{とう}さんが取引会社に宛{あ}てて出した文書である。

---

２０XX 年８月１１日

ABC食品株式会社
営業部　鈴{すず}木{き}一{いち}郎{ろう}様

　お世話になっております。
　さて、８月１０日に貴社より入荷の商品（食品３種類）のうち太陽カップラーメン２００個の一部に破{は}損{そん}がありました。つきましては、早急に破{は}損{そん}のあった食品の全商品の取り換えをお願い申し上げます。

サトーヨーカドー株式会社
仕入部　食品課長
伊{い}藤{とう}次{じ}郎{ろう}

---

伊{い}藤{とう}さんは鈴{すず}木{き}さんに何をしてほしいと言っているか。

１　すぐに、太陽カップラーメン２００個を新しい商品と取り換えてほしい。

２　すぐに、破{は}損{そん}した全商品を新しい商品と取り換えてほしい。

３　すぐに、破{は}損{そん}した商品の一部を新しい商品と取り換えてほしい。

４　すぐに、１０日に入荷した全商品を新しい商品と取り換えてほしい。

Note: the alignment of the date and sign-off has been altered (from align right to align left).

Answer 1

It's indeed confusing even to native speakers. So if you received a letter like this, you should ask for clarification...

But as a native speaker, logically thinking, I think the option 1 is the correct answer.

「破損のあった食品」 refers to 「太陽カップラーメン」, that is the name of one of the three foods. So 「破損のあった食品の全商品」 is equal to 「太陽カップラーメンの全商品」, and 「太陽カップラーメン２００個」.

EDIT

The reason why I think the correct answer is 1 is totally by logical thinking.

The key is 「食品」 in 「破損のあった食品」, and the letter says 「貴社より入荷の商品（食品３種類）」. So the 「食品」 in 「破損のあった食品」 should refer to one of 「食品３種類」.

To mean the answer 2, it should be 「破損のあった商品」. As 「破損のあった商品の全商品」 is weird, it would be 「破損のあった全商品」.

Answer 2

Actually I feel the bolded sentence is ambiguous, and I don't think this is a good question. But I feel the request could be much simpler if Ito-san wanted to get only the defective ones replaced:

• 破損のあった食品の取り替えをお願い申し上げます。
• 破損のあった全商品の取り替えをお願い申し上げます。

The object is "(all) the defective items" (i.e., only some of the 200 cups).

But he says instead:

• 破損のあった食品の全商品の取り替えをお願い申し上げます

This somewhat lengthy phrase feels like "complete replacement of the items in which defect was found," which would be likely to mean 1. In this context, 破損のあった食品 refers not to "defective ones out of the 200 cups" but to "太陽カップラーメン out of the three kinds of items".