The English sentence being "I brush my teeth, wash my face, and have breakfast every day."

My translation was

私は毎日歯で磨いて顔で洗って朝ご飯を食べます.

The given answer was

私は毎日歯を磨いて顔を洗って朝ご飯を食べます.

Given the context, I thought で could be used because I'm marking the location/tool/method/condition for an action.

But that's not correct, right? Because 歯 and 顔 should be treated as direct objects and not any of the above?

The English sentence being "I brush my teeth, wash my face, and have breakfast every day."

My translation was 私は毎日歯で磨いて顔で洗って朝ご飯を食べます.

The given answer was 私は毎日歯を磨いて顔を洗って朝ご飯を食べます.

Given the context, I thought で could be used because I'm marking the location/tool/method/condition for an action.

But that's not correct, right? Because 歯 and 顔 should be treated as direct objects and not any of the above?

The English sentence being "I brush my teeth, wash my face, and have breakfast every day."

My translation was 私は毎日歯で磨いて顔で洗って朝ご飯を食べます.

The given answer was 私は毎日歯を磨いて顔を洗って朝ご飯を食べます.

Given the context, I thought で could be used because I'm marking the location/tool/method/condition for an action.

But that's not correct, right? Because 歯 and 顔 should be treated as direct objects and not any of the above?

The English sentence being "I brush my teeth, wash my face, and have breakfast every day."

My translation was

私は毎日歯で磨いて顔で洗って朝ご飯を食べます.

The given answer was

私は毎日歯を磨いて顔を洗って朝ご飯を食べます.

Given the context, I thought で could be used because I'm marking the location/tool/method/condition for an action.

But that's not correct, right? Because 歯 and 顔 should be treated as direct objects and not any of the above?