Skip to main content
style format and reordering for clarity
Source Link
henreetee
  • 3.8k
  • 2
  • 13
  • 33

Use of こと in this sentencedictionary entry

DefinitionI was looking up the word "出席" (attendance) in a Japanese dictionary, and found the following definition:

学校の授業や会合などに出ること。

Word: 出席 (Attendance)

I have copied over the word "出席" and its definition above in a dictionary I am referring to.

From my understanding, I assume こと is added as a normalizer is so that "出る (to turn up/ to appear)" becomes a noun "出ること (the thing of turning up/showing up)". Hence, the definition means "The thing about turning up for the school's class or meeting".

My question is if this is done so that "the thing of showing up" which derives from adding こと to 出る to change the verb into a noun is so that "the thing" refers to the word, which I assume to be a noun, "出席".

So the sentence becomes something like "Attendance(The thing = Attendance) is about turning up/ being present for the school's class or meeting". This is a poor intepretation but this is for the sake of expressing what I meant in my question.

Use of こと in this sentence

Definition:

学校の授業や会合などに出ること。

Word: 出席 (Attendance)

I have copied over the word "出席" and its definition above in a dictionary I am referring to.

From my understanding, I assume こと is added as a normalizer is so that "出る (to turn up/ to appear)" becomes a noun "出ること (the thing of turning up/showing up)". Hence, the definition means "The thing about turning up for the school's class or meeting".

My question is if this is done so that "the thing of showing up" which derives from adding こと to 出る to change the verb into a noun is so that "the thing" refers to the word, which I assume to be a noun, "出席".

So the sentence becomes something like "Attendance(The thing = Attendance) is about turning up/ being present for the school's class or meeting". This is a poor intepretation but this is for the sake of expressing what I meant in my question.

Use of こと in this dictionary entry

I was looking up the word "出席" (attendance) in a Japanese dictionary, and found the following definition:

学校の授業や会合などに出ること。

From my understanding, I assume こと is added as a normalizer is so that "出る (to turn up/ to appear)" becomes a noun "出ること (the thing of turning up/showing up)". Hence, the definition means "The thing about turning up for the school's class or meeting".

My question is if this is done so that "the thing of showing up" which derives from adding こと to 出る to change the verb into a noun is so that "the thing" refers to the word, which I assume to be a noun, "出席".

So the sentence becomes something like "Attendance(The thing = Attendance) is about turning up/ being present for the school's class or meeting". This is a poor intepretation but this is for the sake of expressing what I meant in my question.

Definition: 学校の授業や会合などに出ること。

学校の授業や会合などに出ること。

Word: 出席 (Attendance)

I have copied over the word "出席" and its definition above in a dictionary I am referring to.

From my understanding, I assume こと is added as a normalizer is so that "出る (to turn up/ to appear)" becomes a noun "出ること (the thing of turning up/showing up)". Hence, the definition means "The thing about turning up for the school's class or meeting".

My question is if this is done so that "the thing of showing up" which derives from adding こと to 出る to change the verb into a noun is so that "the thing" refers to the word, which I assume to be a noun, "出席".

So the sentence becomes something like "Attendance(The thing = Attendance) is about turning up/ being present for the school's class or meeting". This is a poor intepretation but this is for the sake of expressing what I meant in my question.

Definition: 学校の授業や会合などに出ること。

Word: 出席 (Attendance)

I have copied over the word "出席" and its definition above in a dictionary I am referring to.

From my understanding, I assume こと is added as a normalizer is so that "出る (to turn up/ to appear)" becomes a noun "出ること (the thing of turning up/showing up)". Hence, the definition means "The thing about turning up for the school's class or meeting".

My question is if this is done so that "the thing of showing up" which derives from adding こと to 出る to change the verb into a noun is so that "the thing" refers to the word, which I assume to be a noun, "出席".

So the sentence becomes something like "Attendance(The thing = Attendance) is about turning up/ being present for the school's class or meeting". This is a poor intepretation but this is for the sake of expressing what I meant in my question.

Definition:

学校の授業や会合などに出ること。

Word: 出席 (Attendance)

I have copied over the word "出席" and its definition above in a dictionary I am referring to.

From my understanding, I assume こと is added as a normalizer is so that "出る (to turn up/ to appear)" becomes a noun "出ること (the thing of turning up/showing up)". Hence, the definition means "The thing about turning up for the school's class or meeting".

My question is if this is done so that "the thing of showing up" which derives from adding こと to 出る to change the verb into a noun is so that "the thing" refers to the word, which I assume to be a noun, "出席".

So the sentence becomes something like "Attendance(The thing = Attendance) is about turning up/ being present for the school's class or meeting". This is a poor intepretation but this is for the sake of expressing what I meant in my question.

Clarification.
Source Link
Thecie
  • 103
  • 4

Definition: 学校の授業や会合などに出ること。

Word: 出席 (Attendance)

I have copied over the word "出席" and its definition above in a dictionary I am referring to.

From my understanding, I assume こと is added as a normalizer is so that "出る (to turn up/ to appear)" becomes a noun "出ること (the thing of turning up/showing up)". Hence, the definition means "The thing about turning up for the school's class or meeting".

My question is if this is done so that "the thing of showing up" which derives from adding こと to 出る to change the verb into a noun is so that "the thing" refers to the word, which I assume to be a noun, "出席".

So the sentence becomes something like ";The thing;Attendance(ThingThe thing = Attendance) is about turning up/ being present for the school's class or meeting". This is a poor intepretation but this is for the sake of expressing what I meant in my question.

Definition: 学校の授業や会合などに出ること。

Word: 出席 (Attendance)

I have copied over the word "出席" and its definition above in a dictionary I am referring to.

From my understanding, I assume こと is added as a normalizer is so that "出る (to turn up/ to appear)" becomes a noun "出ること (the thing of turning up/showing up)". Hence, the definition means "The thing about turning up for the school's class or meeting".

My question is if this is done so that "the thing of showing up" which derives from adding こと to 出る to change the verb into a noun is so that "the thing" refers to the word, which I assume to be a noun, "出席".

So the sentence becomes something like ";The thing(Thing = Attendance) about turning up for the school's class or meeting". This is a poor intepretation but this is for the sake of expressing what I meant in my question.

Definition: 学校の授業や会合などに出ること。

Word: 出席 (Attendance)

I have copied over the word "出席" and its definition above in a dictionary I am referring to.

From my understanding, I assume こと is added as a normalizer is so that "出る (to turn up/ to appear)" becomes a noun "出ること (the thing of turning up/showing up)". Hence, the definition means "The thing about turning up for the school's class or meeting".

My question is if this is done so that "the thing of showing up" which derives from adding こと to 出る to change the verb into a noun is so that "the thing" refers to the word, which I assume to be a noun, "出席".

So the sentence becomes something like ";Attendance(The thing = Attendance) is about turning up/ being present for the school's class or meeting". This is a poor intepretation but this is for the sake of expressing what I meant in my question.

Clarification.
Source Link
Thecie
  • 103
  • 4
Loading
Source Link
Thecie
  • 103
  • 4
Loading