Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 4, 2016 at 2:23 comment added Blavius @Nothingatall It's not justification for a new class; it's justification to put it into the already existing irregular class.
Feb 4, 2016 at 0:12 comment added Angelos @snailboat Those verbs are mostly regular and identifiable. One or two irregular conjugations isn't justification for a new class.
Feb 3, 2016 at 19:52 comment added user1478 @Blavius There are a number of other irregular verbs, but they're traditionally lumped into one of the first two categories. I'm not sure why.
Feb 3, 2016 at 11:31 comment added virmaior @rhyaeris indeed -- my mistake because i never actually use those categories (prior comment deleted - i never understood why they felt a need to re-invent 一段 vs. 五段 as "group ii" and "group i")
Feb 3, 2016 at 8:49 comment added chocolate 「行かない」「食べない」「起きない」などの「~ない」の形から何段活用か判断する、っていう方法は使われないんですね。。。(日本語教師検定取って日本語教えてる友達が「ない形はかなり初期に暗記させんねん」って言ってたんですけど…)
S Feb 3, 2016 at 7:33 history suggested rhyaeris CC BY-SA 3.0
corrected verb groups; ichidan verbs are actually Group II
Feb 3, 2016 at 7:28 comment added rhyaeris @virmaior Strictly, in foreigner parlance, 行く is a "Group I" verb, a godan verb - though still irregular in the 行って form.
Feb 3, 2016 at 7:26 review Suggested edits
S Feb 3, 2016 at 7:33
Feb 3, 2016 at 5:46 history edited 永劫回帰 CC BY-SA 3.0
edited body
Feb 3, 2016 at 5:41 history edited 永劫回帰 CC BY-SA 3.0
edited body
Feb 3, 2016 at 5:32 comment added Kurausukun @Blavius 行く is only irregular in that it conjugates to 行って, 行った, etc. instead of the expected 行いて, or 行いた, etc.
Feb 3, 2016 at 4:43 comment added chocolate @Blavius I think 行く is a godan verb.
Feb 3, 2016 at 3:27 comment added Blavius I thought 行く was irregular?
Feb 3, 2016 at 3:19 history answered 永劫回帰 CC BY-SA 3.0