Timeline for What "non-standard" katakana are commonly used?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
20 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:43 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://japanese.stackexchange.com/ with https://japanese.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Oct 28, 2015 at 22:48 | history | protected | user1478 | ||
| Oct 24, 2014 at 17:46 | vote | accept | BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft | ||
| Oct 24, 2014 at 0:02 | comment | added | Raizin | @OskarLindberg It's okay. As they say, サルも木から落ちる | |
| Oct 23, 2014 at 20:34 | comment | added | Oskar Lindberg | Yes, you're right. Apparently I'm becoming senile. Good to know that I can still rely on others to correct me when I'm "away on business"... | |
| Oct 23, 2014 at 18:17 | comment | added | Raizin | @Oskar: Yes, it is special. Without exception, all regular yōon digraphs start with a character that end in an い sound, followed by a small character from the や row. フ ends in an う sound. Not one of the digraphs listed here meets both criteria, and all yōon digraphs listed here do (with exception of a few mentioned obsolete digraphs). | |
| Oct 23, 2014 at 14:03 | answer | added | Asano Ryo | timeline score: 0 | |
| Oct 23, 2014 at 2:27 | answer | added | Raizin | timeline score: 30 | |
| Oct 22, 2014 at 9:31 | answer | added | Oskar Lindberg | timeline score: 2 | |
| Oct 22, 2014 at 9:31 | comment | added | Oskar Lindberg | Your example フュ is a normal Japanese digraph [yōon] - nothing special about that one. | |
| Oct 22, 2014 at 6:28 | review | Close votes | |||
| Oct 24, 2014 at 13:17 | |||||
| Oct 22, 2014 at 3:41 | history | edited | BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 156 characters in body
|
| Oct 22, 2014 at 1:29 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackJapanese/status/524734230572453888 | ||
| Oct 21, 2014 at 20:57 | comment | added | Darius Jahandarie | Oh, they aren't officially considered "non-standard" I don't think. The scare quotes are still necessary upon first introduction of that terminology. I was just using "non-standard" to mean any katakana that don't have their corresponding hiragana in use (e.g., ふぁ、くぉ, and such are all very uncommon). | |
| Oct 21, 2014 at 20:56 | comment | added | BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft | @Darius: Oh, I wasn't aware that these katakana were considered "non-standard". Thanks for the edit! | |
| Oct 21, 2014 at 20:55 | history | edited | BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 5 characters in body; edited title
|
| Oct 21, 2014 at 20:50 | history | edited | Darius Jahandarie | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Reword to not be a question looking for a resource, and try to narrow the scope a little
|
| Oct 21, 2014 at 20:46 | history | edited | BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Oct 21, 2014 at 20:42 | review | First posts | |||
| Oct 21, 2014 at 22:22 | |||||
| Oct 21, 2014 at 20:40 | history | asked | BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft | CC BY-SA 3.0 |