Linked Questions

194 votes
5 answers

What's the difference between wa (は) and ga (が)?

When is it correct to use は but not が, and when is it correct to use が but not は? Are there any times when you can use either without changing the meaning of the sentence? How does switching change ...
nevan king's user avatar
  • 7,148
69 votes
2 answers

Why does Japanese have two kinds of adjectives? (-i adjectives and -na adjectives)

Japanese has two kinds of adjectives known by several terms but the ones I know are i-adjectives and na-adjectives - why? I recall that Japanese adjectives are much more like verbs than in English ...
hippietrail's user avatar
  • 15.4k
29 votes
3 answers

So-called の-adjectives - how does の *really* work?

Ok, so there seems to be some controversy over whether we can really say that there are 'の-adjectives', or whether we simply use a noun in an "attributive" way (a term which I don't actually really ...
Karl Knechtel's user avatar
19 votes
3 answers

When is it okay to use あります with a living subject?

When learning Japanese everyone's taught いる is for a living thing and ある is for non-living things. However, I recently saw the following sentence ... あと、サッカー選手でもあります。 ... which ends in ある / あります ...
crunchyt's user avatar
  • 4,415
8 votes
3 answers

Is だ (plain form of です) omittable?

After studying copula verbs だ and です in japanese grammar books by myself a couple of months ago, I was under the impresion that だ is omittable as it is implied by the context. Moving on, I recently ...
Christopher Francisco's user avatar
8 votes
2 answers

Are possessive particles implied in a conversation?

Today, in my Japanese class, my sensei presented a conversation which went as the following: Person A: Bさんのせんこうはなんですか。 Person B: コンピューターかがくです。 Person A: わたしもコンピューターかがくです。 My confusion comes on the ...
Veer Singh's user avatar
2 votes
2 answers

Can the である copula be explained as で (particle) + ある (to exist), i.e. "to exist in the form of ~"?

Recently, I read this article which interprets である as described by this post's title, so 学生である would be analyzed as "(I) exist in the form of a student". On one hand, である originated from にて + あり, ...
3 to 5 business days's user avatar
7 votes
1 answer

What does the verb 好く do?

Observation: The verb 好く exists. 好く is transitive. By extension, "to like ~" is predicted to be: a. ~を好く。 However, empirical data shows that this pattern is the accepted form: b. ~が好きだ。 ...
Flaw's user avatar
  • 20k
1 vote
2 answers

Would it be gramatically correct to say 学校は行きます as opposed to 学校に行きます

My understanding is that 学校は行きます would mean: As for school, I will go there. While 学校に行きます is: I will go to school. But is this the first sentence ever used? Or even grammatically correct?
Hunter's user avatar
  • 25
5 votes
1 answer

Overall syntax of this sentence

この部屋はシャワーだけでお風呂がないんですが。 => "This apartment only has a shower but no bathtub" This would be what I think this sentence says contentwise. I also think it could be a viable translation, but the way ...
Narktor's user avatar
  • 4,847
8 votes
1 answer

で in the copula である

I have always wondered where the で in ~である (and ~でございます) comes from. In the answer to the question 「です」, what is it really? Is my analysis correct?, Eiríkr Útlendi states that the で in ~である is the ...
Kaskade's user avatar
  • 1,619