In Japanese classes, I was taught that 全然 can only be used with negative-meaning words/phrases/clauses, for example:


However, I've observed that, especially in spoken Japanese, some positive na-adjectives are allowed to follow 全然 adverb, for example:


Or even:


Are there any reasons why these na-adjectives do not have to follow the 全然+negative rule? Given any other na-adjective with positive meaning, how to decide whether or not I can use it with the 全然 adverb? (e.g. 全然きれい)

p/s: I am fully aware that we have to look at the full sentence to determine whether the word/phrase/clause that follows 全然 is positive or negative, for example: {大丈夫じゃない} has negative meaning so {全然大丈夫じゃない} is OK. But I hear {全然大丈夫です} a lot in anime/drama, hence this question.

  • I think that dialect also plays a part here. For example, I've heard that it's more common in kansaiben to use 全然 with a positive copula. Not confident enough to risk an answer though :]
    – zakvdm
    Commented Jun 8, 2011 at 6:37
  • @zakvdm - Yes, you are correct about Kansai-ben. It's used all the time there. And I can't believe I haven't yet seen the most obvious one in this thread: 全然いい. I (and tons of people I know) use that ALL the time.
    – istrasci
    Commented Jun 8, 2011 at 14:16

3 Answers 3


Like YOU mentioned, Zenzen being used with positive words is slang and not correct Japanese. That being said, Japanese people use it all the time, especially young people.

Typically I hear 全然 with OK、大丈夫、平気, 楽しい、and きれい with others possibly I haven't heard. That is to say that the words that are used with 全然 in a positive sense are probably limited to just a few words, but because language is living, this list will probably change.

Total off shoot, these words listed above seem like words a ギャール uses all the time and can't get that image out of my mind.

  • 全然きれいも全然OK、たとえ 「彼女:私この服似合ってるかしら?」「全然きれいですよ。」
    – YOU
    Commented Jun 8, 2011 at 6:57
  • What do you think about this sentence I found in a blog: 年は私よりもいってるけど、全然きれいな人なのにたぶんいつもずっといる方なんだと思いました
    – Lukman
    Commented Jun 8, 2011 at 7:00
  • 1
    @YOU But the rule is 全然 follows by negative copula. I'm not sure having negativity elsewhere would allow 全然 to be used. But slang can break any rules anyway >__<
    – Lukman
    Commented Jun 8, 2011 at 7:14
  • 4
    btw what's a ギャール?
    – Pacerier
    Commented Jun 11, 2011 at 6:07
  • 1
    Gya-ru - is a Japanese girls who partakes in a specific fashion. Typically blonde hair that has been put up, may have tanned/orange skin, white lipstick and black eyeliner are the mainstays. Commented Jun 11, 2011 at 8:47

YOU and Mark have already mentioned that 全然 can be used with a small set of positive descriptions, and that this is usage is not considered correct (which might be true, but it's absurdly common, so that doesn't really matter).

But my impression is that the positive version of 全然 is not really limited to a small set of words, but rather to particular situations. The situations I've seen the positive 全然 are all situations where there's an expectation of something "not being X" but it actually "is X". For instance, you'd usually say 全然OKです when someone asks you if something is okay with you and you see that he's not sure whether it is - so you assure him that his negative expectations are completely unfounded and it's completely okay. The same thing happens with the example YOU gave about 全然きれい:

A: 私この服似合ってるかしら?
B: 全然きれいですよ。

A is not sure whether her new clothes look good on her, so she asks for B's opinion. B assures her that they do look beautiful.

On the other hand, this usage of 全然きれい is probably incorrect:

A: その服すごく似合ってるね。 B: そうね。全然きれいよ!

Because here B's saying wasn't against A's (or anyone's) expectations.

  • The situations I've seen the positive 全然 are all situations where there's an expectation of something "not being X" but it actually "is X". YES. +1
    – Amanda S
    Commented Jun 8, 2011 at 18:55
  • +1 great explanation boaz. Didn't know there was seemingly a pattern to all the zenzen madness Commented Jun 18, 2011 at 16:21

全然 has slang form, which means like exceptionally, extremely.

So you can use it in both forms.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .