4

It seems that 襖 has two forms of writing. Here are the two screenshots from Jisho.com:

enter image description here

enter image description here

The first kanji has an extra stroke (ノ).

My questions are the following:

  1. Why does it have two forms?

  2. Are they both acceptable in handwriting?

6

This is a typical matter of locality-related differences. The form on the top is accepted in Japan, as well as Taiwan, Hong Kong, Korea; it's the traditional one from the Kangxi Dictionary:

KX

The form below is the variant accepted as normative in Mainland China.

As for "whether both forms are acceptable in handwriting," yes, they are and no, they are not, but not for the reason above. The simpler form below was introduced to the Japanese computer standard JIS X 0208 in its revision of 1983, replacing the form above; it was called an enforcement of extended shinjitai, that is, forcefully replacing the components in more complex characters by simplified versions if there are other characters with the same simplification (in this case, Jōyō kanji 奧 has been obligatorily simplified to 奥).

However, in Japan legally only less than 2’000 Joyo kanji are supposed to be simplified1, unlike the at least (though in practice no more than) 8’000 of Mainland use. Hence, during the revision of 2004, the old form was restored, and it is the complex form that is included in Jinmeiyō list and is thus allowed in personal names.

To keep things short: yes, everyone accepts the simplified version, because since 1983 tht was the only thing they could (easily) type in computers. No, that's not official, and when writing someone's personal name, you'd rather keep the complex form, as only it is allowed. None of it matters, as in fast writing they are probably indistinguishable.

Appendix: you may use this glyph 襖 (U+8956) to check whether your font adheres to the 2004 forms. Also, with a good font you may choose the forms, by adding U+E0100 symbol after the character to force the simple form, and U+E0101 for the complex form.

1 Yes, less than 2’000. The new additions since the original inception of Jōyō list are not simplified at all, and that’s shy there are such mismatches as 録 (original) vs. 剝 (added). Yes, that’s a mess.

  • However, Japan is unlike Mainland in this matter, and legally only Joyo kanji are supposed to be simplified. PRC actually does almost the exact same thing as Japan, only that PRC’s equivalent of jōyō is a set of 8,000+ characters. Characters outside of this set are not Simplified because there are no guidelines for their usage. This readily becomes apparent when you see a Simplified Chinese text talking about rare and ancient characters. Also, PRC does not have an equivalent of jinmeiyō. – droooze Oct 16 at 19:17
  • I concede. Edited to clarify the situation. – Alexander Z. Oct 16 at 19:32
  • Adding to the mess, 曽, 痩 and 麺 are simplified among newcomers. – broccoli forest Oct 18 at 5:47
  • Adding to the adding to the mess, some of the newcomers are not supposed to be used for the words the mean. 茨 can only be used in 茨, but not to name plant いばら. – Alexander Z. Oct 18 at 9:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.