Do genitive numerical phrases block the plural?

Question

Context:

[両]{りょう}の[貴様]{きさま}は[明日]{あした}の[末]{すえ}に[亡]{な}いです。

with the intended meaning

Both of you will be dead by the end of tomorrow.

This question is about the 「両の貴様は」. I understand that the "plural/collective" is not used if there is a classifier phrase indicating the number of objects preceding the object to pluralize. My problem here comes from the ever-irritating "Inverted Partitive Genitive" behavior. 両の, an adjective-like object (noun in the genitive) meaning "both of," is technically a numerical phrase qualifying 貴様は. My question is:

Should the presence of a genitive numerical phrase prevent pluralization?

More concretely, should my sentence above begin with:

• [両]{りょう}の[貴様]{きさま}は
• [両]{りょう}の[貴様]{きさま}たちは

Answer 1

両の貴様は
両の貴様たちは

I'm afraid both are incorrect and make little sense. To say "Both of you", you could say:

貴様らは二人とも
貴様らはどちらも
貴様らは両方とも
貴様らは両方
etc.

---

"Both [noun]..." could be 両方のXXが, XXが両方, XXが両方とも, eg:

両方の手が, 手が両方, 手が両方とも, 両手が Both hands (nom.)
両方のカードを, カードを両方, カードを両方とも, カードを二枚とも both cards (acc.)
_{You don't need to pluralise the noun.}

But "both of [pronoun]" doesn't work this way; to mean "both of you/us/them", you don't say:

*両方のあなたたちが, *両方の私たちが, *両方の彼らが, *両方のそれらが

You'd instead say:

あなたたち/私たち/彼らが二人とも/両方とも, それらが二つとも/両方とも 　

_{全部 and すべて ("All of ~~") work the same way; you can say 全ての人/人々が, 全ての商品が, 商品が全て, 商品を全部, りんごを３つとも etc., but 全てのあなたたちが, 全ての私たちが, 全部のそれらを sound unnatural.}

---

両の貴様は明日の末に亡いです。

This makes little sense, I'm afraid.

Both of you will be dead by the end of tomorrow.

could translate to something like:

貴様らは二人とも明日の終わりまでには死んでいるだろう。
貴様らは二人とも明日の終わりまでに死ぬだろう。