This question has made me think about the class of adjectives, which can function both as イ- and as ナ-adjective, e.g.

大きい   大きな
小さい   小さな
真っ白い 真っ白な (etc.)
細かい   細かな
暖かい   暖かな
四角い   四角な (etc.)
柔らかい 柔らかな

In my (non-)answer to the question, I mentioned that the difference of やわらかい and やわらかな is very subtle at best.

I am wondering, can this maybe explained in more generality? What are the differences in the word pairs above?

  • I tend to use the な version when i want to emphasize something. I feel like it adds a little more feeling to what you are saying. – Jeemusu Sep 3 '12 at 1:22

After some research, there seems to be little difference in meaning. In some situations, maybe ease of pronunciation is more of a guide than nuance of meaning. For example, in the Balanced Corpus of Contemporary Written Japanese (BCCWJ, 少納言), we have

大きな木  154 results
大きい木   12 results

(But 木 is clearly no abstract concept.)

However, my question stated that 大きい etc. can be used as both イ- and ナ-adjective, which seems to be only half of the truth as 大き shouldn't be considered a ナ-adjective, even though it can modify noun as 大きな.

For example, 大き cannot be inflected, to form an adverb (Cf. 静か → 静かに.)

But 大きな belongs to the class of [連体詞]{れんたいし} (Rikaichan calls this pre-noun adjectival or adnominal adjective, a better name would be adnoun).

連体詞 are words which cannot inflect and must modify a noun (or pronoun), e.g.



as in






These 連体詞 seem to come in 4-5 varieties (depending on the book you read):






All this information is a summary of this site. I hope someone will find it useful.

This should also shed some grammatical light on this and this question.

In an after-thought as to why 小さい時 cannot be 小さな時 is that 小さな is a 連体詞 and must modify a (pro)noun and thus forces the meaning small time, rather than allowing for the interpretation as a sentence in which the (omitted) subject was small, which is usually translated with a relative clause, i.e. the time, when I was small or just when I was small.

So, the general rule seems to be that one can choose either one of the word pair, but when choosing the one ending in な, one chooses to modify directly the noun which must follow it and disallows constructions with relative clauses.

E.g. compare

山の大きい街 vs. 山の大きな街.

The former can mean a city with a big mountain, whereas the latter is necessarily a big city situated on a mountain. (One can probably come up with better examples.)

  • @username1205935: (1) The short answer to your question, as we both say, is there seems to be "little difference in meaning [but...]" (2) My reference did not rule out the use of 「大きな」for "concrete" concepts (eg 木), just that that it was often preferred for abstract words. (3) Your answer got my up-vote after a second read because, although we may not have the straight forward answer you were hoping for, I now have a way to classify a lot of words like あらゆる that did not quite fit my own limited framework of Japanese grammar: 連体詞 / adnominal adjectives. (Thanks) – Tim Sep 6 '12 at 7:06

To answer part of the question:

For 大きい/大きな & 小さい/小さな、I understand the difference is small but na-form is often preferred with abstract words (大きな功績、大きな進歩;小さな間違いvs小さい時、great achievement, great progress, small mistakes vs when I was small(ie child)). I use the word often because there are exceptions: Both 大きい問題&大きな問題 are acceptable.*

*Reference: "nihongo notes 10", p56

  • What does the part about have to do with the question? – istrasci Sep 2 '12 at 4:49
  • We are looking at adjectives, which can function as both イ- & ナ, I diverged to adverbial forms of adjectives く/に but if it is distracting, I'll remove it. – Tim Sep 2 '12 at 5:13

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.