This is what I know.

1) Unlike, say, -p, the final -t of Chinese readings was maintained in careful speech at least as long as the Christian resources of the XVIth century (Frellesvig 2010: 316-7). At least for some, there is a confirmed orthographical confirmation that there was no borrowing with epenthetic vowel.

2) Most of these occur in words that, according to actual spelling, are hidden in kanji, making any kind of ‘tradition’ improbable.

3) The overwhelming majority of those that survivd to modern jōyō list now close it with -ツ.

4) To the moment when the vowel was needed, there was no hearable Middle Chinese to check any feature of readings.

Question: why were some of the syllables fixed in -チ-readings? These are the ones officially declared:

  • セチ 節 ‘node’ (Go-on)
  • ニチ 日 ‘day’ (Go-on)
  • バチ 罰 ‘punish’ (Kan’yō-on, for non-Jōyō ぼち)
  • リチ 律 ‘law’ (Go-on)
  • イチ 一 ‘one’, 壱 ‘judicial one’ (Go-on)
  • キチ 吉 ‘good luck’ (Go-on)
  • シチ 七 ‘seven’, 質 ‘content’ (also チ、Go-on)
  • ハチ 八 ‘eight’, 鉢 ‘bowl’ (Go-on)

Most of these are 1) unique or occurring at most twice; 2) an astounding number are numerals. What is going on in the assigning of Go-on readings?


As you quoted already チ is the sign of Go-on (呉音). Except 罰 is 慣用音 (which means the conventional pronunciation)

Many websites suggest チ came from Go-on while ツ came from Kan-on (漢音). (see https://www.goodcross.com/words/19848-2019 for example)

Basically Go-on is older than Kan-on, which might explain why many numerals are Go-on.

I am not sure of what your 1) means. At least Go-on is the sounds used in South China way before 15th century and they were delivered to Japan through Korean emigrants. Hence the difference.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.