The following is less a question of grammar or language but more of understanding and context, because I feel like I'm maybe missing something. I have the following conversation/sequence of events. There is the Leader with her two subordinates, and due to anime shenanigans she just had a vision or something grip her. Note that both the leader and the subordinates have forgotten a log of their long lives. This is what follows:




記憶にあるか (line break) 二人とも

(next page) 遠い過去…”我らと共にあった者”だ

shock on subordinates' faces



subordinates shake heads

Leader disappointed

Subordinate A:



Subordinate B:




A rough translation of the first bit could be:

Leader: What the heck...was that my memories just now? And two of you too...
long time ago...with "the person who used to be with us".

What about you?

Subordinates: Nope.

Apart from the 二人とも which confused me and that I now think refers to the subordinates and that とも is in this case "also with", this is mostly okay. The bigger problem was the fragmentation of the lines.

But the following kinda confuses me. So we know that the subordinates don't remember the mysterious person. But...

Sub A: But, Leader-sama...I do know how they say "to feel uneasy when not at someone's side"... you know.

Sub B: For me, it's "indispensable and precious thing"...is that so?

Leader: That is..."Something that must be at my side at all costs"...is what it is.

The above is just weird to me.

I'm getting a feeling that they are trying to say that even though they don't know or remember this person that Leader just remembered, they are cognizant that Leader might be sick from being far away from this person, or that they might be something precious to her. And then Leader corrects them a bit about what she actually feels. That she must have that person at her side again at all costs. Problem here is B saying that FOR HER it's a precious thing.


Those two are trying to say that though they don't remember or have had the vision, they are familiar with the feeling of unease since someone is missing (in case of A) and that there is someone precious and indispensable (for B), and then Leader states how she also feels on this. But the problem here IMO is that A doesn't say she feels like this, but that she knows/understands such a pain. Hell TBH, that form "quote"ってのはわかる almost feels like she is saying that she is aware of a saying on those lines.


It could be something entirely different, and all those もの's could be one of its many other meanings that I tend to forget about ;)

So what would be your interpretation of the final exchange? Unless I am mistaken about my interpretation of the part that precedes it.

Also...I'm not sure what's with them making pauses right before the です and だ bit. I'd have thought if they were having trouble saying it, the pause would be sooner. But that's the least of my troubles.

  • in manga, a line break does not split what's being said into two independent phrases, so 記憶にあるか (line break) 二人とも needs to be considered as one complete thought: 記憶にあるか、二人とも It will probably be easier for me to discuss this after submitting a complete translation effort.. hold on (unless someone beats me to it. :P) Nov 30, 2018 at 15:26

1 Answer 1


My sense in this dialogue is that the quotation marks are being used by each character to try to describe their specific feelings or impressions, not as an attempt to quote some other source...

and the "mono"'s are simply a placeholder for this unknown person from their memories, so "someone" seems like the best fit, to me.


What was I just...


Do you have memories too, you two?

遠{とお}い過去{かこ}… ”我{われ}らと共{とも}にあった者{もの}”だ  

in the distant past... (a sense/feeling of)"someone with us"?



(subordinates shake heads, Leader disappointed.)

でもねLeaderさま、”近{ちか}くにいないとなんか落{お}ち着{つ}かない” ってのはわかる。

However, Leader, I do understand/get (the feeling of) "being restless because they're not nearby."

私{わたし}にとっては ”なにより必要{ひつよう}で大切{たいせつ}な”もの …ですね。  

For me, (there's a sense of) "someone important, who I need more than anything"...

*the ですね。 here is being used as an informative voice, not one seeking clarification.

あれは… ”どうあっても我{われ}がもとになければならない”もの …だ

That's... Someone who, "Whatever happens, has to be at my side." ...

All of the ...'s are used exactly as we use them in English, to indicate a long and thoughtful pause. The reason some of them occur before the copula is that this pattern of speech demonstrates thought/hesitancy more than if they followed the copula (because that would allow the next speaker to fill that gap in such a way that it would not come across the same way.)

  • 3
    「あれは...我もとになければならないものだ」の「が」は、「我が国」「我が子」とかの possessive「が」ですので・・・「我が元に」=「 私の元に」って意味で・・ I have to be with them ではなく、質問者の書いた通り "That is something that must be at my side" ですね・・
    – chocolate
    Nov 30, 2018 at 16:38
  • hmm... sorry, I thought those two ideas were interchangeable. Will fix. Nov 30, 2018 at 16:46

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .