In grammar textbooks I see the 〜ても pattern clearly defined, but recently I've encountered a similar usage of も that I can't find a good explanation for. Here are two examples:


(from the monologue at the start of a 僕のヒーローアカデミア anime episode)


(from a RocketNews24 article, talking about being unable to find the right electric shaver)

Is this a casual pattern, or maybe an abbreviation of another pattern? From context it seems similar in usage to 〜ても, or maybe even just 〜けど, but I'm not sure of the nuance.

2 Answers 2


It is an old fashioned way of saying ても. In old Japanese, particles were directly used after verbs' 連体形, without needing a nominalizer such as の or こと. Nowadays, using a particle that way when it's normally used with a nominalizer is considered archaic, so this construct is mostly used in literature or formal situations.



  • In modern day, does ~て (as in ~ても) function as a nominalizer? Jan 18, 2020 at 23:20
  • Yes, the te-form is nominal although it isn't a noun. It's comparable to an English gerund. XXしても "also in the case of doing XX" -> "even if [omitted] does XX / XX is done". The te-form contributes the "ing". Jan 23 at 17:45

The dictionary form + も behaves quite different from te-form + も.

Firstly, it is relatively more bookish. I don't mean you can't use it for a casual topic, but you have to keep the sentence that contains this conjunction in a detached style, like academic or journalistic writing. You can't use it with final particles (ね/よ etc.). Using it in sentences with polite endings (です/ます etc.) is not prohibited, but ですが or でしたが would be more suitable.

Secondly, the focus is different.

  • X-ても Y: Y even (though) X
    an expression that implies X was what had near-highest expectancy not to end with Y, but still Y.
  • X-るも Y: X, only to Y
    describes that the result Y is disappointing from the standpoint of someone who did X. You can take it as a nuanced version of -けど and -が "but". X always in dictionary form even if the event is past.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.