I'm curious about the use of certain particles in combination with nominalizing particles こと and の。I know ことが、のは、etc are acceptable, but can one use particles such as と or など etc.? For instance, would the following sentence be grammatically correct or does it sound very strange?


Is there a better way to express this? Moreover, are ことと or ことなど or のと etc. acceptable particle combos?

Edit: I realize の should be used for experiential verbs, so maybe the following sentence is better:


  • 1
    The former one is fine, but the latter one "書くの方が得意だ" should be "書くことの方が得意だ". "書くのの方が得意だ" sounds strange.
    – user27469
    Nov 5, 2018 at 8:03

1 Answer 1


Your sentence is nearly perfect, but you need の between こと and ほう, because こと and ほう are both (special) nouns.


(As an aside, you don't necessarily need nominalizers here. より and ほう can follow the dictionary-form of a verb, so you can say 喋ったり聞いたりするより読んだり書いたりする方が上手だ. This question is related.)

It's also possible to use nominalizer-の instead of こと, but it sounds less formal, and the combination of の-and-の (one for nominalization and one for linking) sounds odd to me.

[△]喋るのと聞くのより読むのと書くののほうが上手だ。 (questionable)

ことなど is also an acceptable combination.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.