According to this answer there are two types of 〜ない adjectives, those that contain 無い (like 情けない, つまらない also falls here) and those that derive from archaic なう verb (like 危ない). For the first 無い type, how natural is it to negate such an adjective?

Google finds relatively few instances of, say, つまらなくない, some of which a not real negations but questions like "boring, isn't it?". However where are also cases like つまらなくない話 and I see how it might mean "not boring, but still less than interesting". However I can't quite comprehend what kind of person 情けなくない男 would be. In most (all?) cases there's an antonym to 〜ない adjective, so the utility of negation is questionable.

So, is negation of such 〜ない adjectives considered natural, or do you normally avoid it?

  • @EiríkrÚtlendi Now that I check English negative-only words (disgusting, disappointing, reckless) I see they too are quite seldom used with "not". So it was just my wrong impression that negating 〜ない adjective is somewhat unnatural and thus infrequent... Perhaps your comment should be the answer.
    – kroki
    Apr 2 '18 at 18:58
  • I'd started to post that as an answer and was worried I wasn't quite addressing your last line, so I deleted that and put it in a comment. I've taken your suggestion and un-deleted it. :) Apr 2 '18 at 21:07

Saying something is つまらなくない doesn't mean it's interesting; saying someone is 情けなくない doesn't mean they're hopeful / sympathetic / happy. By analogy, we also can -- but don't often -- negate negative adjectives in English, to similar effect: "this book is not uninteresting, that scan is not entirely illegible, the person over there standing by the ice-cream van is not unattractive," etc. etc. The double-negative in either English or Japanese indicates more of a middle-ground quality -- not great, not awful, kind of "meh".

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.