What is the difference between 試験に受かる and 試験が受かる? It seems that the first one means "to pass an exam" while the second one is more like "passing exams" (really not sure about it).

In which cases would に be used together with an intransitive verb?

  • 5
    試験が受かる sounds agrammatical because the subject for the verb 受かる is not 試験 but 私/あなた/山田さんetc. so you might say 山田さんは試験に受かった but not 山田さんは試験が受かった.
    – user1016
    May 11, 2012 at 15:14
  • 2
    As Chocolate said, 試験が受かる is not grammatical. Therefore, although 受ける and 受かる may look like a transitive-intransitive pair like 閉める and 閉まる, I do not think that they are really a transitive-intransitive pair. May 11, 2012 at 16:26
  • 1
    @Chocolate: Yeah, the question was confusing to me, but the conversation between you and OP clarified why he thought that 試験が受かる should be grammatical. May 11, 2012 at 16:41
  • 1
    @TsuyoshiIto Indeed, i considered them a transitive-intransitive pair. Moreover in JMDict, 受かる and 受ける are marked as intransitive and transitive respectively. Their meanings however dont seem to match and i realize my mistake now. How is it possible to identify those "fake" transitive-intransitive pairs?
    – buskila
    May 12, 2012 at 1:19
  • 3
    I doubt that there are many “fake” transitive-intransitive pairs. The only other example I managed to come up with is 分ける/分かる, where 分かる has a very different meaning (the correct pair is 分ける/分かれる). If such pairs are really rare, then probably the easiest way is just to remember them as exceptions. May 12, 2012 at 3:05

1 Answer 1


(The question was already essentially answered in comments by Chocolate and me, but I am posting an answer as an answer.)

To answer the question literally, 試験に受かる (to pass an examination) is grammatical, but 試験が受かる is not grammatical, as Chocolate stated in her comment.

But a more interesting part comes from your logic based on which you thought that 試験が受かる would be grammatical in the first place. Although your logic was unclear to me until I read your comment in response to Chocolate’s comment, once I understood the logic, it perfectly made sense.

Your logic: The event ドアを閉める can be described from a different perspective by saying ドアが閉まる. Similarly, it must be possible to restate 試験を受ける as 試験が受かる (*). But there is also an expression 試験受かる. What is the difference between 試験が受かる and 試験に受かる?

Alas, the sentence marked with (*) above is false! 受ける and 受かる may look like a transitive-intransitive pair just like 閉める and 閉まる, but they are actually not, and we cannot restate 試験を受ける as 試験が受かる. Also note that 試験を受ける (to take an examination) and 試験に受かる (to pass an examination) describe different events, and in both cases, the subject is the person who takes/passes an examination.

The only other “false” transitive-intransitive pair like 受ける and 受かる that I can think of is 分ける (to divide) and 分かる (to understand; often written as わかる). The correct transitive-intransitive pair is 分ける and 分かれる.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .