4

In RADKFILE, the only radical 暇{ひま}, 霞{かすみ} and 蝦{えび} share is 又. It doesn't have anything for the two other distinct parts of 叚.

I haven't seen the parts in other kanji, except that the left one looks a bit like 尸 with two additional strokes and the top right one looks like the katakana コ (which was derived from 己).

What are they?

  • 3
    Keep in mind that RADKFILE is something assembled purely based on visual resemblance to help people look characters up. It doesn't tell you anything about what elements make up the character historically speaking. – snailplane Jun 12 '17 at 7:17
  • @snailplane Good point. I was just thinking if the parts were used for some other kanji as well and if there was a connection between the left side of 叚 and 尸, like how 腕 has 月 in it, with 尸 being an easier way to draw something else – siikamiika Jun 12 '17 at 12:38
  • @siikamiika Your guess is pretty plausible, that could well be the case. But, judging from the old forms, the left part either is a generic cover originally similar to 厂, or else (together with 又) a variant of 皮. At least, I've found no researchers connecting it to 尸, which looked fairly different in the ancient shapes. – melissa_boiko Jun 12 '17 at 12:56
  • @leoboiko Too bad the origin is unclear. Maybe I should ask what Jim Breen thinks of adding 尸 + 一 and/or 二 (and ヨ?) to RADKFILE for kanji that have 叚. I used to have problems looking them up because I thought they had 尸. – siikamiika Jun 12 '17 at 13:28
  • If you want to get decompositions of kanji into components, try github.com/cjkvi/cjkvi-ids rather than radkfile. – Super-User Mar 8 at 23:57
4

As snailplane said, RADKFILE is not a source of information on the history of kanji components, their hierarchical decompositions, or their original rationale.

The origin of 叚 is unclear. Its old meaning is "false", "provisional", and 又 is a pictograph for the right hand, often grasping something (indicating tool use, actions, etc.):

又 Oracle Bone form 又 Seal form

You can see in the early forms of 叚 that コ probably comes from another hand, facing the other way (the kind that in most kanji resulted in a ヨ shape):

叚 Bronze form

The left side seems like some sort of cover or container with horizontal markings inside. According to Tōdō's interpretation this could be showing the act of "hiding" items, related to them being "false". Sears thinks it's "a hand with a flint knife striping a skin off an animal", but that feels like a stretch to me; though other people (like Harbaugh) also connect the left part to an altered "skin" (皮). Shirakawa thinks it's an unpolished jewel cut off from a mountain, but Shirakawa is insane and basically always wrong. In summary, there seems to be no consensus.

Since all of 暇蝦霞假瑕葭遐碬豭赮騢 are pronounced カ (with 蝦霞碬赮騢 also sharing ゲ and 假碬豭 ケ), the common presence of 叚 in them is certainly for phonetic reasons.

(All images from Sear's Chinese Etymology website.)

| improve this answer | |
5

The original meaning is not universally agreed upon, but the structural composition is not ambiguous. The earliest form of 「叚」 is comprised of 「石」 on the left and 「又」 on the right.

西周

enter image description here
盠尊
集成6013

Please refer to What is the etymology of the kanji 石? for a more detailed overview of「石」. Key points:

  • 「石」was originally a picture of stone chimes.
  • 「口」was not present originally, being added as a distinguishing component to mark the name of a region.
  • What looks like a cover「厂」in later forms was a graphical reduction of the stone chime shape.
  • The two horizontal marks that appear in some forms are decorative (Chinese: 飾筆), and don't contribute to any semantic or phonetic function (decorative marks are also seen in modern forms of many characters like「魚」and「甚」).

春秋

enter image description here
曾伯陭壺
集成9712


enter image description here
秦律十八77
睡虎地秦簡


enter image description here

 

Afterwards, 「刀」 was added to the top-right. The modern form of 「叚」 should be seen as composed from 「石」 (left, inherited from a form with decorative marks and no 「口」 ), 「刀」 (top right), and 「又」 (bottom right).


References:

  • 林義光《文源》
  • 何琳儀《說文準聲首輯佚》
  • 季旭昇《說文新證》
  • 小學堂
| improve this answer | |
0

Here you can find the meaning or the relating information.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.