3

1)

元々恋愛と結婚は別のものと彼女は考えていた。

and

2)

元々彼女は恋愛と結婚は別のものと考えていた。

Would I be right in saying that

1) focuses on the fact that she thought marriage AND love were different

2) focuses on that it was HER who thought love and marriage were different

Also a little confused on the usage of particles at the end because 1) has は考えていた. What is the difference between は考えていた and を考えていた?

Thank you :)

Improve this question
3
  • Oops, I "corrected" を考えていた to と考えていた in Sentence 2 without thinking, but are you sure you are concerned about を考えていた? を考えていた doesn't make much sense to me, so please double-check.
    – naruto
    Apr 18 '17 at 5:06
  • Thank you! The first sentence is from a book and the second sentence is one I wrote because I was confused about the particles in the first sentence. Why does を考えていた not make sense?
    – Ria
    Apr 18 '17 at 5:26
  • 3
    @Ria [noun]を考えていた vs [clause]と考えていた (think that ~)
    – broccoli facemask
    Apr 18 '17 at 5:57
3

They have the same meaning. The difference between these sentences is word order, and that's about it.

  1. 元々恋愛と結婚は別のものと彼女は考えていた。
  2. 元々彼女は恋愛と結婚は別のものと考えていた。

I'd translate:

  1. Originally, love and marriage are different, she thought that.
  2. Originally, she thought love and marriage were different.
Improve this answer
1
  • If there's anything, 元々 "originally" has an ambiguity whether it's inside or outside what she thought in the first sentence.
    – broccoli facemask
    Apr 19 '17 at 0:30
0

元々恋愛と結婚は別のものと彼女は考えていた。
元々彼女は恋愛と結婚は別のものと考えていた。

I think that most Japanese think the two sentences have the same meaning.

Improve this answer

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.