Here is how Wiktionary defines オブジェ in the context of art:


My very hesitant attempt at a translation:

It depends on the represented target, but in avant-garde art it is an object that has been transformed in order to produce an illusionary effect.

  1. Could you improve my translation of the Wiktionary definition?
  2. Is the result a good definition of オブジェ?
  • 2
    I see little reason not to use the existing definition in the English language for the original French word transparently referred to by the Japanese: objet d'art.
    – Dave
    Nov 28, 2011 at 12:18
  • @Dave: objet d'art is broader than オブジェ. A commode Louis XV can be an objet d'art but not an オブジェ, as far as I understand. Nov 28, 2011 at 14:21
  • "オブジェ (n) objet d'art (fre:), item of artwork" according to EDICT, which is not always the most reliable source, but makes reasonable sense here.
    – Dave
    Nov 28, 2011 at 14:37
  • 1
    in terms of the transformative power of avant garde art i think illusory is the wrong word to use here. i think this def. is referring to something like duchamp's urinal, where because of the artist's intervention the object takes on heretofore unknown or unseen power and meaning. however, in japanese, i heard this term used just like "sculpture". as in "my house is right across the street from that big sculpture"- i remember they used オブジェ in that sentence, free from any mystical pretense.
    – yadokari
    Nov 28, 2011 at 17:33
  • perhaps here "visionary" would be a better trans of 幻想的. though visionary doesnt fit well w the sentence
    – yadokari
    Nov 28, 2011 at 17:35

2 Answers 2


Here is another, (but similar,) approach... but combining both possible definitions of "objet" in the original context:


An expression transformed into an object (used to surreal effect, in avant-garde art.)

Note: "surreal" is used here to demonstrate a different approach for that part of the translation, though, something having to do more with the word "illusion" would probably be more accurate.

Also, (and as already noted in the comments on the question,) this part: It depends on the represented target, doesn't seem to be in the original writing.

As long as the definition fits with the definition of "objet" in French, the translation into English should be fine.


A target of depiction. In avant-garde art, an object introduced to create an illusory effect.

This might not be the best translation, but it avoids the pitfalls that others seem to have fallen into.

The first comma is a listing comma separating two definitions of the word.

となるもの doesn't have much meaning, except for maybe taking an fairly abstract word (対象) and explicitly creating an instance of it.

幻想的 I find hard to translate, since I feel it's somewhere between "dreamy" and "illusory", both of which have slightly different connotations in English.


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .