The pronunciation of [三日]{みっか} and [六日]{むいか}, the 3rd and 6th days of the month, are very similar, as are [四日]{よっか} and [八日]{ようか}, the 4th and 8th days of the month. Is there any inherent significance to that? That is, was there historically any etymological process like infixing a glottal stop (or the historical predecessor of っ) or ablaut to derive the name of the 2n-th day of the month from the n-th day? I'm thinking about something like the etymology of 'eleven' and 'twelve' in English, which came from longer words that were approximately 'one left' and 'two left'. I haven't run across any productive process for doubling numbers in other languages, though (especially small ones); is this just a coincidence or convergent evolution?

  • It may well be that if such similarities aren't due to coincidence, whatever process created them happened so long ago that they're as good as coincidence as far as we can tell.
    – Sjiveru
    Jul 15, 2016 at 23:27

1 Answer 1


Here is how people counted numbers up to ten in archaic Japanese:

number    n-th day         (modern Japanese)
--------  ---------------  -----------------
ひとつ    ひとひ/ついたち  ついたち
ふたつ    ふつか           ふつか
みつ      みか             みっか
よつ      よか/ようか      よっか
いつつ    いつか           いつか
むつ      むゆか           むいか
ななつ    なぬか           なのか
やつ      やうか           ようか
ここのつ  ここぬか         ここのか
とを      とをか           とおか

So these day names except for 1日 were directly derived from number + か, although they underwent some sound changes. Notably, many vowels before か were turned to "u" (eg, futatsu → futuka, nanatsu → nanuka, kokonotsu → kokonuka). In addition, many やう sounds were later changed to よう (eg きゃう(京) → きょう, やうやう(漸う) → ようよう), and that's probably why the sound of 8日 became even closer to that of 4日.

Ultimately, your question is about simple numbers. Are there any relationships between みつ (3) vs むつ (6), and よつ (4) vs やつ (8)? Actually, some people suspect that they are etymologically related, because むつ can be considered as "double みつ", and やつ as "double よつ". According to 『和力: 日本を象る』:


This seems to be only a hypothesis. These numbers have been used since long before Japanese people learned how to write characters. It must be very difficult to make a definitive conclusion.

Finally, please note that よっか and ようか sound very different to the ears of native Japanese speaker today. Speech recognition software like Siri is often bad at distinguishing these, but the chance of misunderstanding in human-to-human conversations is reasonably low.

  • Great, thanks for your very informative answer. As for the last paragraph, I think よっか and ようか sound quite different even to people who don't speak Japanese. (As a native English speaker who's only been studying Japanese for about a year and a half, distinguishing, say, よっか from よか isn't difficult; distinguishing ようか from よか is a little bit harder but something one gets used to listening for (if not quite producing consistently) quickly.) English doesn't have phonemically contrasting length, but I don't think it's difficult for English speakers to at least recognize it with pratice.
    – anomaly
    Jul 16, 2016 at 15:04
  • Relationship between ひと and ふた has the same structure too.
    – user4092
    Jul 17, 2016 at 6:34

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .