Last time I wanted to say "Disturbing someone is bad", so I directly wrote:


But I just came across another way of saying it :


It bothers me a lot not to know the nuance between those two, because it's not the first time I think about it, so what would the difference between the nominalizer の(は) and しては is?

1 Answer 1


lit. Disturbing someone is bad

lit. If/should it disturb(s) someone, it is bad

の is but a nominalizer, while ては is a conditional expression. You can translate the latter as "disturbing someone is bad" in some situations too, but the two are different in principle. Maybe a better translation is "I'm afraid of disturbing someone" for the latter.

  • Is a reasonable translation of the bottom sentence also something like "Even as little as disturbing someone is bad" or "So much as disturbing someone is bad"?
    – George
    Commented Mar 1, 2023 at 0:01
  • @George Allow me to ask an English question: in what kind of situation do you say "so much as doing..."? Commented Mar 2, 2023 at 12:51
  • Saying it in just that way wouldn't be very idiomatic in English :) But we could say things like "Making the slightest noise can really set this guy off!" or "This person is so sensitive that even the slightest disturbance can make him very angry!" I believe this conveys a similar idea as "even as little as disturbing someone is bad...", which seems to me what the Japanese in the second sentence is (literally) saying?
    – George
    Commented Mar 3, 2023 at 3:10

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .