There is a phrase 罪を着せる translated (J-to-E) as "charge someone with a crime", "pin a crime to someone", "assign guilt to someone". So a crime has been committed and one takes actions to attribute blame for the committed crime to someone else.

But ALC also shows 罪を着せる when searching for "to frame someone" (E-to-J). Here the English phrase could also be used in a situation where someone takes actions before the actual crime was committed, so that blame would fall to a target person.

Can I use Japanese 罪を着せる in the latter situation (meaning something like 将来の罪を着せる)?

If not what would be the proper Japanese phrase to describe setting someone else up, framing somebody? たくらむ feels to broad for this meaning, doesn't it?

2 Answers 2


When someone does [罪]{つみ}を[着]{き}せる, if there is no 罪, it's impossible to do 着せる, so 罪 is supposed to exist. However, it's possible that 罪を着せる is used to express actions related with prospective 罪, as mentioned by narutoさん in the answer.

The expression 罪を着せる does not specify what someone actually does. So, the actual action of 罪を着せる could be lying, remaining silent, blaming someone else without proof, destroying real evidences, inventing fake evidences or things like that.

But whatever s/he does, the point of 罪を着せる is that s/he "puts the blame on someone who is innocent" or "sets someone up to take the fall."

It doesn't matter much who is guilty of the crime actually. Almost anyone can be the subject of the idiom 罪を着せる. For example, let's say, there are four people here and a crime occurred. No one, except the culprit and the witness, knows who did that.

A: is guilty of the crime and keeps it secret.

B: is the witness and knows A did that.

C: is innocent and does not know anything about the crime.

D: is also innocent and does not know anything about the crime.




These are all grammatical and valid usage of 罪を着せる.

The synonyms of 罪を着せる are




If you want to express "deceiving" nuance rather than "blaming" nuance, 「仕立て上げる」 can be more suitable, I think.



These examples are too sad if really happened. But both sentences are grammatical, and both「犯人に仕立てあげる」 and 「悪者に仕立て上げる」 are common usage of 仕立て上げる.

In some situations, 「はめる」 and 「[罠]{わな}にかける」 can be used to describe a similar nuance, as mentioned by user4092さん in the comment. 「[陥]{おとしい}れる」 can also imply a similar meaning. These expressions mainly imply "deceive and drive someone into an awful situation." So I guess that 罪を着せる can be one way of はめる, 罠にかける, or 陥れる, but it's not the only way to achieve them.


Yes, you can say something like this:

  • 彼に罪を着せるために、あらかじめ彼のスーツに香水の臭いを付けておいた。
  • その電話は、彼女に罪を着せようとして仕掛けられた罠だったのです。
  • 2
    多分 Original Posterさんが聞きたいのは「罪を着せる」が 「to frame someone = (人を) はめる」と同じく、それ自体に「罪を着せようとして罠にかける」意味があるかだと思います。
    – user4092
    Sep 7, 2015 at 9:56
  • おおなるほど、質問の意図がいまいち掴めてませんでした…。それ自体に「罠にかける」という意味はないですよねえ。
    – naruto
    Sep 7, 2015 at 10:45

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.