How does one know the "hiragana spelling", i.e. the hiragana representation of the word is


but not other forms involving misspelling one or more of the following

  • か vs. が
  • て vs. で
  • つ vs. づ or ず

, especially when the pronunciation of か, て, つ in the word in reality is affected by a tendency to 濁音. I'm told that the unvoiced k-row sounds and t-row sounds are often pronounced as voiced g- and d- sounds when they are not appearing as the first sound of words.

Please enlighten me!

  • 1
    There's a lot of general rules you can use to guess, but is this a word where you have a particular tendency to 濁点 wrongly? – virmaior Feb 1 '15 at 3:14
  • 1
    Here's a starter for you: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rendaku – virmaior Feb 1 '15 at 5:01
  • 1
  • 1
    @qazwsx The first two tracks sound like ちかつ. The last track sounds fine (except for the second to last instance, which again sounds like ちかでつ). – Earthliŋ Feb 4 '15 at 5:38
  • 1
    I agree with Earthling. To me track #1 and track #2 sounded like ちかれつ or something... (BTW I couldn't tell the difference between #1 and #2.) – isayamag Feb 4 '15 at 17:28

I don't agree with what you were told about it.

Of course in rapid speaking consonants tend to be pronounced rather roughly, and it may be prominent especially in non-initial consonants, but still voiceless consonants (k, t, ts, etc.) have to be distingushed from voiced ones (g, d, z, etc.) in Japanese.

For example in this conversation:

A: じゃあ明日には完成するんだな?

B: [誓]{ちか}うよ。

the word 誓う must not be pronounced ちがう, because ちがう means another word 違う, and, 誓う and 違う are totally different two words which are to be distinguished only by the voiced-ness of the second consonant, /k/ vs /g/.

In short (and linguistically), /k/ and /g/ are a pair of different phonemes which can constitute a "minimal pair".

Theoretically this kind of pair can happen with any word containing relevant consonants (like [香水]{こうすい} vs [洪水]{こうずい}, [囮]{おとり} vs [踊り]{おどり}, [文系]{ぶんけい} vs [文芸]{ぶんげい}..., etc.), so, I recommend you to always try to pronounce them distinctively; I mean, voiceless consonants voicelessly, and voiced voicedly, at least until you get very fluent in Japanese.

And all this situation also applies to any native speaker. They have to differentiate words in those pairs too. か/て/つ in ちかてつ is never pronounced fully voiced to appear as が/で/ず, so as to avoid confusing with words like ちがてつ, ちかでつ, ちがでず..., etc, though in this case they are all non-existent words.

[EDIT] In reply to qazwsx's comment

As for your final question, my answer is clear; Just forget this "g-ng contrasting" (which you are trying to perform) and simply stick to the "k-g contrasting" (read words as their ローマ字 are spelled). Have you ever seen a textbook that explains about this "g-ng contrasting" whatever? I bet you haven't (because there is no such one), and you should not take in such a rule which is not mentioned in any one of existing textbooks.

Here is a short report by 国語審議会 (National Language Council), stating that people incapable of pronouncing 鼻濁音 are increasing among young generation, in addition to the already existing people who use dialects without 鼻濁音. Your theory is WRONG in the first place.

To be very precise, yes, a kind of this "g-ng contrasting" does exist in Tohoku dialects, mainly among aged people. But when your are new to a language, no doubt you should learn the standardized one first, not a dialect.

So I strongly recommend you to quit this "g-ng" practice immediately, and get back to the standard "k-g" pronunciation.

  • My current practice is to pronounce 誓う as chi-ga-u and 違う as chi-nga-u, i.e. the latter has a 鼻濁音. My understanding is that virtually all people fluently speaking Japanese pronounce 誓う as chi-ga-u even though its hiragana representation/spelling is ちかう. So there is a memory burden to remember both forms and using chi-ga-u for speaking and chi-ka-u for writing. How to effectively deal with this? – qazwsx Feb 3 '15 at 2:47
  • qazwsx, I made a reply to you in the answer above :) – isayamag Feb 4 '15 at 0:43
  • 1
    How about here, here, or here (← you can request sentences). – broken laptop Feb 4 '15 at 9:15
  • 1
    No, that exactly sounds as ちかてつ to me... Now I think this is all about this "aspiration vs voicedness" stuff (just like broccolli forest explained), and you should train yourself to focus on the "voicedness" of consonants (which plays a key roll in discerning consonants in languages like Japanese), not on the "aspiration" (which I guess you have been used to using discerning consonants in your mother language). It may sound a little complicated, but anyway, I believe getting used is the best way, just like anything. Listen a lot, speak a lot and good luck! – isayamag Feb 5 '15 at 10:38
  • 1
    @qazwsx I... I hardly have any words to add to isayamag's comment :D And it's totally ちかてつ to me, too. – broken laptop Feb 5 '15 at 15:08

I think you've mixed up two different things:

  1. voicing in compound words (連濁)
  2. deaspiration in non-initial position

The first one is a grammar rather than pronunciation. In most cases, whether the voicing happens or not is determined by word, and the kana spelling always reflects the pronunciation change i.e. 雲 (くも) → 雨雲 (あまぐも), 雷雲 (かみなりぐも), 浮き雲 (うきぐも) etc. You're not allowed to do such things like sometimes say あまぐも and sometimes あまくも.

Note that this rule refers historical classification of 清音/濁音, so we do 日 (ひ) → 夏日 (なつび), 曜日 (ようび) etc. even they no longer form voiced/unvoiced pair in today's pronunciation.

The second one is a pure pronunciation problem. We aspirate voiceless (stop) consonants in the beginning of word, but do not in other places: た, り (aspirated) vs. みた, こり (unaspirated). English speakers, too, aspirate them at the beginning of first or stressed syllables: pie, repine (aspirated) vs. spy, occupy (unaspirated). This doesn't mean it could change into voiced consonants. The voiceless/voiced contrast is fundamental in Japanese pronunciation.

However, if your mother tongue doesn't have this distinction, it's possible that you overlook the difference. Especially when you speak a language that counts aspiration but not voicedness (just opposite to Japanese), including Chinese, Korean, Georgian, Zulu or Scottish Gaelic, you may have false belief on sound qualities without proper care. If that's the case, what you have to do is just practice.

Technically, some languages like American English or German could have weaker voicing that the difference is mainly perceived through other factors. Japanese voicing I believe is more "typical" than them, but you can also use various side effects of voicing, such as buzzing undertone, slightly lower voice or less crisper sound, as aid of hearing.

Now I see that you have difficulties distinguishing voicedness.

Listen to it: https://clyp.it/0omton0o

I pronounced 12 pieces of sounds in total, with labial/dental/alveolar/velar consonants each combined with aspirated (VOT > 100ms), tenuis (0 < VOT < 10ms; don't mind tenseness) and voiced (VOT < -100ms) articulations.

         aspirated    tenuis    voiced
p/b         #1          #2        #3
t/d         #4          #5        #6
ch/j        #7          #8        #9
k/g         #10         #11       #12

Basically, you have to train to accommodate yourself hearing #2, #5, #8, #11 as voiceless, and #3, #6, #9, #12 as voiced. However, there's another pitfall in Japanese, that people often use tenuis series instead of voiced series in word-initial, where unvoiced sounds are expected to be aspirated.

This post in linguistics SE would be helpful, too.

  • So you are saying I should pronounce 地下鉄 as /chikatetsu/ but not anything more voiced than that in any part? But all the spoken version of the word uttered from Japanese-speaking mouths (native tongue or not) sound different from that, in that various unvoiced consonants changed to their voiced counterparts. For example, translate.google.com/#auto/en/%E5%9C%B0%E4%B8%8B%E9%89%84 – qazwsx Feb 3 '15 at 1:23
  • 1
    Strictly speaking, we pronounce it [[tɕʰi̥kɐtetsɯ]], that means the first and the rest consonants are indeed different, but all consonants are nevertheless voiceless. Google voice synthesis sounds right (though not ideal), that's what we call unaspirated voiceless sound. Compare it to real voiced consonants: ちがでず, which is [[tɕʰiŋɐdezɯ]] (d and z are what I mean; don't mind she sounds g as ng here, it's just "textbook" pronunciation only newscasters follow today). – broken laptop Feb 3 '15 at 10:09
  • 1
    Could you recommend a textbook for IPA. I know some incomplete basics about it when learning English as a second language and Chinese phonology. But I really want to get a more general exposure to it. – qazwsx Feb 4 '15 at 4:29
  • This would be a good handbook on IPA symbols, but I recommend you to learn their phonetical backgrounds first. Also some websites provide the real sounds of IPA. I updated my answer about how Japanese (stop) consonants actually sound. – broken laptop Feb 4 '15 at 11:55
  • The last two of each of the four triplets sounds same except the tone is slightly different. – qazwsx Feb 5 '15 at 8:25

(Expanding on my comments; this post only covers the spelling part rather than any pronunciation confusion you may have had.)

I'm told that the unvoiced k-row sounds and t-row sounds are often pronounced as voiced g- and d- sounds when they are not appearing as the first sound of words.

Kanji have on readings (音読み, Chinese-derived ones) and kun readings (訓読み, native Japanese ones). What you were told applies primarily only to kun readings. Rendaku happening with on readings is very rare. [1]

I admit that I don't know how the Chinese study (Japanese) kanji and their readings, but westerners typically learn the kanji and its readings, and they learn which readings are on readings, and which kun.

Also, as you may have learnt, words that typically consist of two kanji in a row are much more likely to use the on readings of a kanji.

Let's take 地下鉄, as it was your example. It's

地: on: チ ジ
下: on: カ ゲ  kun: した しも もと さ.げる さ.がる くだ.る くだ.り くだ.す くだ.さる お.ろす お.りる
鉄: on: テツ   kun: くろがね

You might note that チ、カ、 and テツ are all on readings; hence, there won't be any voicing for them. The word will be read as ちかてつ

Another word, 手紙:

手: on: シュ ズ  kun: て
紙: on: シ     kun: かみ

Note that かみ is a kun reading; hence, it is likely to rendaku into がみ in this word: てがみ

[生け]{いけ}[花]{ばな}, same thing. はな is a kun reading → likely rendaku.


会: カイ エ    kun: あ.う あ.わせる あつ.まる
釈: シャク セキ  kun: とく す.てる ゆる.す

シャク is an 音読み, so it won't be ジャク

Compound words, however, are a common exception to the 'no rendaku for on readings' rule. [会]{カイ}[社]{シャ} becomes がいしゃ when paired with the word 株式: [株]{かぶ}[式]{シキ} + [会]{ガイ}[社]{シャ}. My guess is that the Japanese no longer consider these at a kanji (reading) level but at a word level, and the word acts like a native kun reading.

[1] I'm seeing perhaps one case of a 連濁-ed on reading for every hundred words, if not fewer than that. [忍]{ニン}[者]{ジャ} is a good example

  • For 忍ニン者ジャ, it's probably because its 音読み itself is a ジ sound rather than a シ. – qazwsx Mar 4 '15 at 7:14
  • 1
    @qazwsx: The on'yomi of 者 is シャ、not ジャ。I'm confused as to what you are trying to say. – oals Mar 5 '15 at 11:40
  • In contemporary Mandarin, the consonant of 者 is zh (Pinyin), which is voiced and sounds closer to ジ instead of シ. – qazwsx Mar 6 '15 at 2:14
  • @qazwsx: I think it's more likely that the preceding ん is affecting the situation (ease of pronunciation). See e.g. 患者、信者、 but 前者、有権者、初心者、論者、出身者 – oals Mar 6 '15 at 8:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.