What is the grammatical relationship between these two words?

Are they just different words expressing the same concept, is one the derivation of the other or is a third option true?


だ is a conclusive copula, etymologically a contraction of で+ある. It is used sentence-finally (hence the name "conclusive"). The uncontracted form is still available in Modern Japanese, but it's somewhat different in distribution and more formal. だ isn't actually a verb―it cannot stand alone and doesn't inflect like a verb. で+ある isn't a verb either, but it is a construction containing the verb ある. The copular で is a contraction of literary にて.

な is an adnominal copula, etymologically a contraction of なる from に+ある. It is used before nouns (hence the name "adnominal"). The uncontracted form なる is now very limited and―outside of the literary register―usually only appears with specific words such as 聖なる that can now be viewed as lexical exceptions.

The two can be now viewed as forms of the same thing. Etymologically, the difference is that だ contains て, but な does not:

 (に+て)+あり → にて+あり → で+ある → であ → だ (conclusive copula)
  に   +あり → に +あり → なり   → なる → な (adnominal copula)  

Etymologically speaking, both だ and な contain the Old Japanese copula infinitive に n-i, which is related to the adnominal copula の n-o, which was present in Old Japanese and is still around today:

 (n-i+て)+あり → にて+あり → で+ある → であ → だ (conclusive copula)
  n-i   +あり → に +あり → なり   → なる → な (adnominal copula)  
  n-o                           → の (adnominal copula)

In other words, all three forms descend from the same Old Japanese defective copula n-. Note that in traditional grammar, the adnominal copula の is not analyzed as a copula and is instead treated as a use of the genitive case particle の. You can find it in monolingual Japanese dictionaries listed as expressing 同格の関係 ("an appositive relationship").

In modern Japanese, we find all three forms in alternation, and they can all be considered forms of the same thing. Generally speaking, is used clause-finally ("conclusively"), while and are used before nouns ("adnominally"). Specifically:

  1. is used following な-adjectives (called 形容動詞 in traditional grammar)
  2. is used following nouns under most circumstances (including の-adjectives)
  3. is used following nouns before certain grammatical words such as の

So we find:

 きれい 〜 きれい花    (きれい is a な-adjective)
  病気 〜  病気人    (病気 is a の-adjective, a special type of noun)
   弟 〜   弟太郎   (弟 is a regular noun)
  病気 〜  病気のだ   (な is used before certain grammatical words such as の)

In traditional grammar, の-adjectives are simply considered nouns, and for our purposes here we can follow the same line of thinking. The boundary between the noun and な-adjective categories is rather fluid in any case, and many words belong to both categories.

Note that in traditional grammar, だ is analyzed as a separate word when it follows a noun, but an inflectional ending when it follows a な adjective (形容動詞). Most modern grammars depart from traditional grammar on this point and present だ as a separate word in all cases, as I've done here.

References, by request:

  • For more historical information about だ, な, and の, see Frellesvig's 2010 A History of the Japanese Language or Vovin's 2005, 2009 A Descriptive and Comparative Grammar of Western Old Japanese.
  • For a brief introduction to だ, な, and の in Modern Japanese, see Iwasaki's 2013 Japanese: Revised edition.
  • For a detailed modern analysis, see Martin's 1975 A Reference Grammar of Japanese, though he uses rather different terminology―he calls の-adjectives "precopular nouns" and な-adjectives "adjectival nouns".
  • For a quick online reference, see 大辞林's entry for だ, which covers its etymology and the use of adnominal な before words like の.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy