Prompted by a comment thread, I was curious if my understanding of the semantic differences between

[nominal phrase]?
[nominal phrase]なの?
[nominal phrase]ですか?
[nominal phrase]なんですか?

is actually correct or just a delusion.

(か? and のか? further complicate things so I've left them out to keep everyone sane.)


I conjured up a bunch of example scenarios and have tried to categorize them and how each different type of ending works.


When you are asking for something to be confirmed because you didn't hear it or it was surprising...

医者[○?  xなの?  ○ですか?  xなんですか?]

なの? and なんですか? seem like they are asking a redundant question to me. I would not be surprised if this was me making a mistake, though.

Referring to immediate states of things

There's a certain class of 形容動詞 which seem to behave differently, for example:

ダメ [○?  ○なの?  ○ですか?  ○なんですか?]
大丈夫[○?  ○なの?  ○ですか?  ○なんですか?]

These 形容動詞 seem to accept simply ?.

However, ones which don't refer to the immediate states of things don't accept ? nearly as easily, e.g.:

きれい[x?  ○なの?  ○ですか?  ○なんですか?]
上手 [x?  ○なの?  ○ですか?  ○なんですか?]

(I can't seem to think of any 名詞 which allow just ? aside from in the confirmation usage.)


Sometimes, you follow a statement up with a question asking regarding some inference you've made.

彼は医者[x?  ○なの?  △ですか?  ○なんですか?]

I think the latter three all work, but なの? and なんですか? seem to "flow" a tiny bit better to me than ですか?.

Question words

誰[○?  ○なの?  ○ですか?  ○なんですか?]

Normal questions

彼氏は医者[x?  ○なの?  ○ですか?  ○なんですか?]

Other things

There are other things like rhetorical questions which use none of these endings, so they are not included unless there ends up being a good reason.

Comparing the endings

So, sometimes multiple things work equally well. Are there differences in nuance?

  • There's the obvious difference in politeness between the non-です and です versions.
  • I really do not see a difference between ですか? and なんですか? in the cases I have them both marked as ○. This is unlike the non-question case: 「彼氏は医者です。」「彼氏は医者なんです。」, where the latter sounds more like you're making a stance on something or using the sentence as justification something.
  • When both ? and なの? are possible, なの? seems more childish to me.

The question

So, how much have I gotten wrong here? Are there other types of scenarios worth considering? (Sorry for the long blogging question.)

I'm totally open to an answer which completely ignores my analysis and gives a radically different one.

  • possible duplicate: japanese.stackexchange.com/questions/13470/…
    – user312440
    Aug 25, 2014 at 9:23
  • I would really be quite disappointed in an answer which just says something syntactic, which I'm not interested in at all because the answer fairly clearly does not lie there if any of my judgements are correct. The right way to answer the question depends on what the truth is, which is why I left it open ended, but I'm truly just interested in which of the listed endings are acceptable in what contexts for nominal phrases. Aug 25, 2014 at 16:08

3 Answers 3


I'd say that the ones you've picked are pretty regular semantically.

  1. ~? and ですか?are simple yes/no questions used when you have no prior information one way or the other. You can also use them to confirm that you heard correctly.
  2. なの? and なんですか? tie the question in with the discourse or prior assumptions. You've heard or gotten some hint that e.g. he's a doctor, and you want to confirm or express a nuance of surprise/disbelief/awe etc: "医者なの?""医者なんですか?". Likewise, if you'd heard that he was NOT a doctor, you'd use "医者じゃないの?""医者じゃないんですか?"
  3. I'd say that in each pair, ですか? and なんですか? are pretty much just polite versions of the others.

All nouns and na-adjectives work fine before "?", by the way.

If you start looking at less commonly used patterns like か?, なんだ? etc, it gets a bit hairier.

  • Thanks. Your response seems to align with user4092's. I'm truly surprised that all nouns and na-adjectives work fine before ? -- it really sounds quite weird to me. I wonder why. Maybe just some mistake I made long ago and reinforced for years. Aug 26, 2014 at 0:15
  • After talking with one of my friends, I thought of a scene which convinced me it's actually fine 「彼女がいるんだぜ」「きれい?」「ちょう美人」「すげええよくできたじゃねーかよ」 or something like that. I guess I just wasn't thinking hard enough when I wrote the question. Aug 26, 2014 at 0:53
  • Though that usage feels really "lazy"/colloquial compared to 「大丈夫?」 which sounds totally run-of-the-mill. Aug 26, 2014 at 0:54
  • Another scenario where I accept all na-adjectives and nouns with ? is when they are extended (which is markedly feminine): 「あたし、きれい〜?」. Aug 26, 2014 at 1:00
  1. For a confoirmation to 彼は医者になった, both 医者? or 医者なの? work. But the formar is more associated with nuance of "Huh? Perdon me?" while the latter has more to do with surprise.
  2. きれい? or 上手? are fine.
  3. For a reply to「彼氏は病院で働いてる」, it's 彼は医者[○?  ○なの?] though the latter has more sense of inference.
  4. As a normal question (e.g."Excuse me, do you have a boyfriend who is a doctor?"), it's 彼氏は医者[○?  ×なの?].

Polite versions are just parallel.

  • 1
    Thanks! Those judgements are pretty radically different from mine. Just for my own records, are you a 標準語 speaker? Gender (if you don't mind disclosing)? Aug 25, 2014 at 16:41
  • 1. It's independent from either dialects or gender. 2. Any educated Japanese are a 標準語 speaker. Or are you discriminating other dialects than New Tokyo dialect?
    – user4092
    Aug 26, 2014 at 3:38
  • 1
    Depending on what dialect people grow up speaking they tend to think about various constructions differently, so its nice to know that information in case there's ever contradictory judgements. Did not mean to challenge/offend. Aug 26, 2014 at 4:04

I agree with the comments from the other two answers. I am not sure how useful this will be but as I looked into guidance on acceptable sentence endings a little while ago (in particular when the zero copula, の and か can be used) you might be interested to see what I found for “question statements”. As I already had them I have kept のか? and だ in but by all means disregard these parts.

The most useful reference was “Da and the Zero Form as the Two Contracted Forms of the Japanese Copula” by Mioko Miyama (which I got from Snail boat and you can google). I have pasted the list I made using this paper of acceptable endings for questions (excluding です) below.

Acceptable stand alone questions formats per M Miyamoto’s paper (Nb: ∅=zero copula)


誰が学生 な の?
誰が学生 だ?
誰が学生 ∅?
誰が学生 であるのか?
誰が学生 なのか?

Yes/No questions:

太郎が学生 なの?
太郎が学生 ∅?
誰が学生 であるのか?
誰が学生 なのか?

The other points I think are relevant are:

1. の-nominaliser/です

As per the extract from Snailboat in Chat yesterday, there is some “controversy”but の can be used (1) when the speaker wishes to include some conjecture/attitude – touched upon by Dainichi - or (2)just as a plain question marker (with no extra nunace).

With questions ending in ですか I think の is only used when including such conjecture/attitude, because it is not acting as a question marker. So if, for example, you are just seeking information (with no prior knowledge) then んですか may sound out of place (I have an example and references).

I am not aware of any difference in politeness between questions and non-questions using んです(か).

With なの I think the additional nunaces may be conveyed by intonation/emphasis.

2. Nouns vs 形容動詞

The paper I cited states that “although adjectives are not under consideration here, da after nominal adjectival predicates behaves in the same way” . Based on this statement and inquiries to native speakers, there is no difference in the copular taken by nouns and that taken by 形容動詞.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .