Handwriting liberties

Question

So this is my first time tying to convert handwriting to text, and its left me with a few questions.

Line 6 Char 2; I would say is likely せ but I've not come across any instance where stroke 3 can extend below stroke 2, nor can I find a Kanji that comes closer. It this correct?

Line 5 char 4; I would say is likely 這, since I can find a font that has the radical 言 with a vertical carrot on top instead of a bar, however that font doesn't have 這. Is changing top bars to carrots common?

Line 4 char13; 石 is really small, so I would expect to radical attached to 亦 but as I fail to find a matching Kanji, I have to assume the tininess is just inconstancy in Kanji size?

Did I get anything else wrong?

The Hand wring is from an authors response to a reader (typed) question.

Text version

As Submitted                       As Corrected By Answers
ブルマ！？                           ブルマ！？
ブルマの魅カですか！？                 ブルマの魅カですか！？
ブルマのすそがちょっとズして              ブルマのすそがちょっとズレて
赤くなったフトモモのブル石亦              赤くなったフトモモのブル石亦 
に舌む這ゆせたいです！                 に舌を這わせたいです！
ふせの柔うかい肉体む                   少女の柔らかい肉体を
舌先で、ブルマの尓の息触                舌先で、ブルマの布の感触
む舌のサイドでじながう                   を舌のサイドで感じながら 
思う存分舐め回したいです！               思う存分舐め回したいです！

Answer 1

Line 6 Char 2; I would say is likely せ but I've not come across any instance where stroke 3 can extend below stroke 2, nor can I find a Kanji that comes closer. It this correct?

You wrote ふせ. It should be 少女.

Line 5 char 4; I would say is likely 這, since I can find a font that has the radical 言 with a vertical carrot on top instead of a bar, however that font doesn't have 這. Is changing top bars to carrots common?

I don't know why you're calling them "carrots" but yes, it's common.

Line 4 char13; 石 is really small, so I would expect to radical attached to 亦 but as I fail to find a matching Kanji, I have to assume the tininess is just inconstancy in Kanji size?

Yeah, this is strange. I'm hoping someone else will answer on this... It looks like a radical attached to 亦, but like you I can find no such kanji. ブル石亦 doesn't make any sense either though lol. I would like to say that they just mis-wrote it, but I would be more confident saying that if I could guess what word they actually wanted to write.

EDIT: From the context in the following paragraph, I'm fairly sure they meant to write ブル跡. It doesn't have any useful results on google, but it has a precedent in ブラ跡 which is a common word (ブラジャーの跡→ブラ跡、、、ブルマの跡→ブル跡).

Did I get anything else wrong?

這ゆせたい should be わ. Yes, writing the start of the 2nd stroke of わ、れ、ね like this is common.

舌む should be を.

柔うかい should be 柔らかい.

肉体む should be を too.

ブルマの尓 should be 布{ぬの}.

息触む should be 感触を.

舌のサイドでじながう should be 感じながら.

Just like reading someone's handwriting in your native language, some of it comes down to figuring it out from the surrounding context/word. The verb 這う is never going to become 這ゆせる, 肉体む doesn't make any sense, etc.

Answer 2

Looking up the character 亦 on its own shows 1) it is a kanji variant of また（又), and 2) that it has several 人名 readings. So I'm gonna go out on a limb and say 石亦 is possibly the name いしまた or いしばた.