I'm a bit confused about ~としたら and its exact usage. What is the difference between this and other structures expressing "if" (~なら, たら-form, etc.)?

For example, let's take a sentence from one of my textbooks. If I used ~なら, does it have the same meaning?



Another example: do those two sentences express the same?




1 Answer 1


It is mostly about the degree of likelyhood implied regarding the content of the subordinate clause.

「としたら」 would generally express a lower degree of likelihood in the eyes of the speaker than 「たら」 or 「なら」 would. The difference, however, is often fairly subtle in actual usage for many speakers.

You could always lower the degree of likelyhood in question by adding 「もし」 to any one of the aforementioned expressions.

Thus, your first pair of sentences have nearly the same meaning. As I have explained, the speaker of the first sentence would be feeling that what he has heard is less likely to be true than the speaker of the second sentence would be feeling.

The same can be said about your second pair of sentences. You would say the first sentence in a place where one would be less likely to encounter a lion than you would say the second.

  • Thank you. Is there any difference in one expression being more casual than others?
    – Szymon
    Commented Apr 11, 2014 at 13:31
  • 1
    Only between たら and なら, there is. Former is more casual, but not by much.
    – user4032
    Commented Apr 11, 2014 at 13:34

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .