The following sentence comes from 中上級の日本語 magazine for february:


It is grammatically correct but I find the change from active to passive voice, ie from extensively describing journalists' activities in the active voice to connecting those activities to the topic of newspaper articles in the passive, quite jarring.

Is this just because I am not a native speaker, who would find this quite natural, or is it just not very good writing? (Given that this is a magazine for students of Japanese you would not expect bad writing in the explanatory passages by the magazine's staff.)

1 Answer 1


Having read it several times, I could only say that that is good writing. It contains no errors, ambiguity or unnaturalness; therefore, it would not cause any misunderstanding among the readers.

Mixing active voice with passive voice in a sentence is nothing new in English, is it? Consider the following sentence.

"Tofu is made by coagulating soy milk and then pressing to remove the liquid. "

I find the structure of this English sentence similar to that of the Japanese sentence in question. Only, the passive voice verb phrase "is made" (「書かれています」 in the Japanese) will come at the end of the sentence in the Japanese.

  • Part of the confusion might be because of the use of both topic and subject. I think that English L1 speakers (for example) sometimes have to spend a tiny bit more effort to link 〜が and 〜は, especially when they are doing different jobs with different verbs in the same sentence. Dec 22, 2016 at 18:55

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .