12

The Okinawan word for "Okinawa" is ウチナー, for "person" is チュ, and for "Okinawan" (person) is ウチナーンチュ.

I'd like to know where this ン comes from between the part for "Okinawa" and the part for "person". Standard Japanese 日本人{にほんじん} doesn't seem to have an equivalent.

  • Could it be a reduced form of Okinawan ヌ, the equivalant of standard Japanese の?
  • Could it be an "epenthetic" sound added in certain kinds of compound words?
  • Or something else entirely?
  • 2
    I would guess it's the same phenomenon which leads to rendaku in Japanese. Note that there are other words like アチネーンチュ, イナカンチュ, ヤマトゥンチュ... – Zhen Lin Mar 12 '14 at 17:31
  • @ZhenLin: I suppose it could seem like assimilation, which is what rendaku is an example of. But what makes it different is that in assimilation, properties of one or both sounds influence each other at a point of contact. Whereas epenthesis adds a new sound. Both are for reasons of prosodics though. These examples show that the first component can change but the n comes with the チュ – hippietrail Mar 12 '14 at 19:04
  • 1
    Rendaku is not just a phonological phenomenon. It is thought that the voicing is a remnant of an infix /n/. However I admit I do not know of other words with an infix /n/ in Okinawan – that's mostly because I don't know Okinawan. – Zhen Lin Mar 12 '14 at 23:27
  • 1
    @razorramon I've already checked, and I don't believe The Languages of Japan answers this question. By the way, books published prior to 1923 are in the public domain, but TLoJ was published in 1990, rather more recently. Although it's not free of charge, you can probably find it at a library. – snailcar Mar 13 '14 at 0:53
  • 2
    Random websites online seem to suggest ンチュ corresponds to Japanese の人, with the ヌ reducing to ン like you suggest, and チュ perhaps coming from と. Unfortunately, I don't have any good sources to check at the moment, so I'm not really qualified to write an answer. – snailcar Mar 13 '14 at 1:30
0

I conjecture it is from ぬ <- の. Why?

Okinawan actually has a regular sound change ぬ -> ん. For example, 犬{いぬ} -> いん. So I presume that somehow the regular sound changes got applied twice, and you get ん <- ぬ <- の.

  • 2
    You should think it terms of sound correspondence rather than sound change since we know Okinawan is not an offshoot of modern standard Japanese. They are sister languages rather than Okinawan being a daughter language of Japanese. Likely they have both changed from a distant common ancestor and we know from Old/Middle Japanese that modern standard Japanese has changed quite a lot. – hippietrail Apr 6 '14 at 3:20
  • 1
    Of course I meant sound change from some common ancestor. This common ancestor is much closer to the Japanese branch, and thus is usually approximated as Old/Middle Japanese. Really, Middle Japanese is okay, since we see no remnant of 上代特殊仮名遣い and all sound correspondences from Early Middle Japanese are perfectly regular. So ぬ does come from an ancestral の-like sound. (Case in point: Japanese retains the big picture of the proto-Japonic verb system. Okinawan does something weird with forming everything as a compound with をる) – ithisa Apr 6 '14 at 20:49
  • Great! You know much more about this than I do. Sorry for the dumbed down version (-: I find I frequently have to explain this stuff to people going just on intuition. Glad you're not one of them so I can learn something (-: – hippietrail Apr 6 '14 at 23:34
  • Lol, the inverted smiley is rather hard to read (fyi the "standard" version is :-)). I at first thought it was a disfigured sadface at first XD. (*^_^*) is way better – ithisa Apr 8 '14 at 2:26
  • 1
    Well I won't bow down to northern hemisphere cultural imperialism d-: – hippietrail Apr 8 '14 at 7:33

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.