I know that -たち and -ら pluralize the nouns they come after (or indicate a group that the noun is part of), but most of the time the plural in Japanese is implicit. When is it appropriate or necessary to use -たち or -ら?

(Bonus question: is there any difference except formality between -たち and -ら?)

6 Answers 6


「~[方]{がた}」, 「~[達]{たち}」, and 「~[等]{ら}」 have the same meaning as "et alia" or "and company" in English; you use it when you mean one person (any of the three suffixes) or animal (「~達」 and 「~等」 only) and all the others that are attending them (e.g. 「アマンダさん方」).

「~方」 is honorific and 「~達」 is neutral, but 「~等」 is deprecating or familiar and so should usually only be used with family or the first person unless you have a specific reason for it.

  • 5
    Note that ~ら is used more like ~たち without pejorative connotations in Kansai-ben, though. And I think 彼ら is common even in standard speech, but you still wouldn't use it in reference to superiors. Commented Jun 19, 2011 at 3:31

Adding to the previous answer, I feel that usage with the so-called Japanese pronouns is somewhat of a special case. For one, the plural cannot be implied without adding a suffix. 私, 彼, 彼女 and あなた alone never mean (approximately) we, they or the plural you. Secondly, I don't think adding ~達 or ~等 has the nuance of putting an emphasis on any one individual in the group, as they do when used with other nouns.

Also, one more pluralizing method, though one that is used very restrictively - both in regard to vocabulary and style, is reduplication. It's used mostly with natural landmarks (山々、木々) and (in child-language and as a dual) body parts (目々 etc.).

  • 6
    This probably applies to any word that can be used as pronoun. ひと in itself can easily stand for both a single person and many of them, but once you add あの, あのひと would always stand for one person.
    – Boaz Yaniv
    Commented Jun 19, 2011 at 7:08

Unfortunately I don't have a good answer, but I do have one fact to toss out there, since it doesn't look like anyone else has yet. A number of Japanese linguistics texts I've seen indicate that it's a fallacy that -たち and -ら are pluralizers. Rather, it's claimed that their meaning is qualitative rather than quantitative, and it's merely that most cases where they are used are also plural semantically (correlation rather than causation). I know I've seen (though I don't recall in which article it was) counterexamples where they're used with singular meaning. That said, I don't well understand what they actually mean.

  • 4
    The only counterexample I can currently recall is 「[友達]{ともだち}」, but I'm sure there are a few more. Commented Jul 30, 2012 at 0:40
  • This would be much better with a specific citation. Commented Aug 29, 2023 at 22:51

This doesn't relate to the necessity/appropriate-ness of when you use them necessarily, but it's related to the topic in general. So I'll post it.

Note that there are several other ways to pluralize things, but their usage is very limited:

  • ども: Used as a very humble plural. 広辞苑 cites 「私ども」and 「身ども」. I've heard of the former, but apparently 「身ども」 was used in old samurai speech.
  • とも: Means "all" when added to another noun.
    • 3人ともパーティーにいった → All three of them went to the party.
    • りんごは5つとも腐っていた → All five of the apple were rotten.

Also, concerning ら, it is often used to "pluralize" places/areas (at least in Kansai-ben); often formed with ~[辺]{へん}.

  • [梅田]{うめ・だ}ら辺 → the area(s) around Umeda
  • あそこら辺 → those places/areas over there

When is it appropriate or necessary to use -たち or -ら?

  • The suffixes are very appropriate when you're refering to a group of people, for example: 君達、お前ら. That's what a teacher would say to his students. In that case, it seems to me that ら is quite harsh.

お前ら、なにしているのかい? (angry guy addressing a group of noisy youngsters)

君達には明るい将来があります! (schoolmaster during graduation ceremony)

マイク達と一緒に飲んでいたんだ (youngster telling his mother he was out drinking with Mike and his other pals)

  • The suffix ら is used in formal writing to mean "et al.", and written in kanji, as in this famous scientific publication written by 小林等
  • I think this sounds like what Ignacio meant by ら being depreciating (the usage I'm familiar with). But take a look at these examples. This is the type of usage the the bounty is intended for. Commented Jul 27, 2012 at 5:41
  • (たち seems almost as common here) Commented Jul 27, 2012 at 5:48
  • 1
    @Axioplase: Do you have a reference on your last claim? I feel as if the reading とう or maybe など is more likely here...
    – Zhen Lin
    Commented Jul 27, 2012 at 7:07
  • @ZhenLin: For my last claim, I have several years of experience doing academic research in Japan. But suddenly, you make me doubt… I've often read "ら", and I'm pretty sure the kanji was used as well.
    – Axioplase
    Commented Jul 27, 2012 at 8:24
  • 1
    I Agree with Zhen's comment. Or, 他{ほか} is also used.
    – user458
    Commented Jul 28, 2012 at 20:41

I don't see that anyone has mentioned it, but exclusively either たち or ら are permitted for certain pronouns. For example:

彼ら ✅ | 彼たち ✕

See the Wikipedia article on Japanese pronouns for more info

  • 私ら is definitely in use
    – Angelos
    Commented Apr 13, 2021 at 4:11

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .