Is it okay to use に to mark the caller when using 電話がかかる? i.e. A received a call from B would be


Google seems to indicate that から is a much more popular choice than に. I find it a bit strange, since I thought (whenever both に and から are viable options) に was preferred for agents and から for sources, and receiving a phone call seems more like the former case.

  • 1
    I would read this as "A made a call to B". Sep 14, 2013 at 16:22

2 Answers 2


In the sentence


に indicates the recipient of the phone call. It would be very confusing if you suddenly tried to indicate the caller with に as well. に and から are not both viable options to indicate the caller, because に is already used to indicate the recipient.

If you used に to indicate the caller, it would be like trying to say "I got a package from him" this way:


which actually means "he received a package."

You can say "A got a call from B" like this:


or more commonly


If you are the recipient of the call, you can omit the に part and it will be understood:

I got a call from B


I think you need to look at the nature and type of verb.

かかる is an intransitive verb of direction ("virtual motion" in cyber space) and the sentence describes the direction of the subject, the telephone call: It is natural to describe the starting and finishing points with から and に.

It would be different if this were a transitive verb, or an action being done by one person for/to another. In such cases に might be preferred to から, particularly with a 〜てもらう(etc) type of construction.

Read "ThisSuitisBlackNot"'s answer with this in mind.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .