Skip to main content
Spelling mistake
Source Link

Most of the usages of に I've seen have it directly followed by a verb directly attached to it. (The location of existance にある/にいる, The action objective e.g 私は電車に乗りました, etc)

I know there are some that don't directly have に follow a verb, but its still heavily reliant on a verb (私は六時に家を出す出る)

However, に can also be used when there are no verbs in the sentence

私に必要です Or 私には必要です

  • I interpret (at least the first sentence) as [smth] is essential to [me] or 私*

I (somewhat) get the fact that に and には mean kinda different things and are to be differentiated, so i will just refer to the first sentence.

What usage does the fall into here? Is there a certain way it gets applied in any sentence with only a noun/ adjective (as in it gets used the same way/ means the same thing)

Other maybe-related examples i found

タバコは体に悪い。 The way i see it (i guess) is that the に marks that tabacco is 悪い towards/ for the body/体. But why can't we use something like が here?

私に何か用ですか。 I guess this sentence works in a similar way to the 必要 one, labelling 私 as "What will i use/ be in use for me"

Sorry if this seems like an obvious question, but im genuinely stumped.

(Edited to explain how i see it)

Most of the usages of に I've seen have it directly followed by a verb directly attached to it. (The location of existance にある/にいる, The action objective e.g 私は電車に乗りました, etc)

I know there are some that don't directly have に follow a verb, but its still heavily reliant on a verb (私は六時に家を出す)

However, に can also be used when there are no verbs in the sentence

私に必要です Or 私には必要です

  • I interpret (at least the first sentence) as [smth] is essential to [me] or 私*

I (somewhat) get the fact that に and には mean kinda different things and are to be differentiated, so i will just refer to the first sentence.

What usage does the fall into here? Is there a certain way it gets applied in any sentence with only a noun/ adjective (as in it gets used the same way/ means the same thing)

Other maybe-related examples i found

タバコは体に悪い。 The way i see it (i guess) is that the に marks that tabacco is 悪い towards/ for the body/体. But why can't we use something like が here?

私に何か用ですか。 I guess this sentence works in a similar way to the 必要 one, labelling 私 as "What will i use/ be in use for me"

Sorry if this seems like an obvious question, but im genuinely stumped.

(Edited to explain how i see it)

Most of the usages of に I've seen have it directly followed by a verb directly attached to it. (The location of existance にある/にいる, The action objective e.g 私は電車に乗りました, etc)

I know there are some that don't directly have に follow a verb, but its still heavily reliant on a verb (私は六時に家を出る)

However, に can also be used when there are no verbs in the sentence

私に必要です Or 私には必要です

  • I interpret (at least the first sentence) as [smth] is essential to [me] or 私*

I (somewhat) get the fact that に and には mean kinda different things and are to be differentiated, so i will just refer to the first sentence.

What usage does the fall into here? Is there a certain way it gets applied in any sentence with only a noun/ adjective (as in it gets used the same way/ means the same thing)

Other maybe-related examples i found

タバコは体に悪い。 The way i see it (i guess) is that the に marks that tabacco is 悪い towards/ for the body/体. But why can't we use something like が here?

私に何か用ですか。 I guess this sentence works in a similar way to the 必要 one, labelling 私 as "What will i use/ be in use for me"

Sorry if this seems like an obvious question, but im genuinely stumped.

(Edited to explain how i see it)

Added some more explanation
Source Link

Most of the usages of に I've seen have it directly followed by a verb directly attached to it. (The location of existance にある/にいる, The action objective e.g 私は電車に乗りました, etc)

I know there are some that don't directly have に follow a verb, but its still heavily reliant on a verb (私は六時に家を出す)

However, に can also be used when there are no verbs in the sentence

私に必要です Or 私には必要です

  • I interpret (at least the first sentence) as [smth] is essential to [me] or 私*

I (somewhat) get the fact that に and には mean kinda different things and are to be differentiated, so i will just refer to the first sentence.

What usage does the fall into here? Is there a certain way it gets applied in any sentence with only a noun/ adjective (as in it gets used the same way/ means the same thing)

Other maybe-related examples i found

タバコは体に悪い。 The way i see it (i guess) is that the に marks that tabacco is 悪い towards/ for the body/体. But why can't we use something like が here?

私に何か用ですか。 I guess this sentence works in a similar way to the 必要 one, labelling 私 as "What will i use/ be in use for me"

Sorry if this seems like an obvious question, but im genuinely stumped.

(Edited to explain how i see it)

Most of the usages of に I've seen have it directly followed by a verb directly attached to it. (The location of existance にある/にいる, The action objective e.g 私は電車に乗りました, etc)

I know there are some that don't directly have に follow a verb, but its still heavily reliant on a verb (私は六時に家を出す)

However, に can also be used when there are no verbs in the sentence

私に必要です Or 私には必要です

I (somewhat) get the fact that に and には mean kinda different things and are to be differentiated, so i will just refer to the first sentence.

What usage does the fall into here? Is there a certain way it gets applied in any sentence with only a noun/ adjective (as in it gets used the same way/ means the same thing)

Other maybe-related examples i found

タバコは体に悪い。

私に何か用ですか。

Sorry if this seems like an obvious question, but im genuinely stumped.

Most of the usages of に I've seen have it directly followed by a verb directly attached to it. (The location of existance にある/にいる, The action objective e.g 私は電車に乗りました, etc)

I know there are some that don't directly have に follow a verb, but its still heavily reliant on a verb (私は六時に家を出す)

However, に can also be used when there are no verbs in the sentence

私に必要です Or 私には必要です

  • I interpret (at least the first sentence) as [smth] is essential to [me] or 私*

I (somewhat) get the fact that に and には mean kinda different things and are to be differentiated, so i will just refer to the first sentence.

What usage does the fall into here? Is there a certain way it gets applied in any sentence with only a noun/ adjective (as in it gets used the same way/ means the same thing)

Other maybe-related examples i found

タバコは体に悪い。 The way i see it (i guess) is that the に marks that tabacco is 悪い towards/ for the body/体. But why can't we use something like が here?

私に何か用ですか。 I guess this sentence works in a similar way to the 必要 one, labelling 私 as "What will i use/ be in use for me"

Sorry if this seems like an obvious question, but im genuinely stumped.

(Edited to explain how i see it)

Tried to add more tags
Link
Source Link
Loading