Timeline for Why is 空【くう】, and not 無【む】, used to define "void", "emptiness" in a buddhist context? What are their nuances?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2016 at 0:28 | comment | added | A.Ellett | @broccoliforest wow. thanks for correcting me. i wonder how i got that idea into my head. | |
| Oct 21, 2016 at 15:08 | comment | added | broccoli forest | @A.Ellett At least character-wise, they are distinct two characters with different pronunciations. | |
| Oct 19, 2016 at 18:59 | comment | added | A.Ellett | My understanding was that 空 is alternative version of 虛 not a completely different character. | |
| Oct 19, 2016 at 16:36 | review | Late answers | |||
| Oct 19, 2016 at 17:12 | |||||
| Oct 19, 2016 at 16:21 | review | First posts | |||
| Oct 19, 2016 at 16:30 | |||||
| Oct 19, 2016 at 16:16 | history | answered | Wuwo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |