Timeline for Is じゃないです equally correct as じゃありません?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2011 at 2:26 | history | edited | Axioplase | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 characters in body
|
| Aug 12, 2011 at 12:40 | comment | added | Tsuyoshi Ito | I do not think that changing “difference” to “grammatical difference” makes your sensei’s assertion any more accurate. As other people correctly state, ないです and ありません are different in formality and nuances. | |
| Aug 12, 2011 at 6:31 | comment | added | Murphy | Updated answer to be more accurate. | |
| Aug 12, 2011 at 6:30 | history | edited | Murphy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 12 characters in body
|
| Aug 12, 2011 at 0:10 | comment | added | Tsuyoshi Ito | Probably your sensei meant that they are almost the same. But if your sensei really does not notice any difference, I am sorry but I think that he or she is simply insensitive to the subtlety of the language. | |
| Aug 11, 2011 at 22:36 | history | answered | Murphy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |