Timeline for Are ミツバチ and イルカ more frequently written in katakana?

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

10 events

when toggle format	what		by	license	comment
Jun 17, 2020 at 8:18	history	edited	CommunityBot		Commonmark migration
Jun 11, 2015 at 7:27	history	edited	The Wandering Coder	CC BY-SA 3.0	added 380 characters in body
Jun 11, 2015 at 4:56	history	edited	The Wandering Coder	CC BY-SA 3.0	added 248 characters in body
Jun 11, 2015 at 4:09	history	edited	The Wandering Coder	CC BY-SA 3.0	added 417 characters in body
Jun 11, 2015 at 3:57	comment	added	The Wandering Coder		I never said it depends on context (although I did mention two contexts where it is either Katakana or Kanji). I said that most of the time (outside of biological textbooks and studies, ie. in normal conversation) Katakana is used. As to your list, I id not have said list until you updated your post, thus I will have to also fix mine accordingly.
Jun 11, 2015 at 3:53	history	edited	The Wandering Coder	CC BY-SA 3.0	deleted 2 characters in body
Jun 11, 2015 at 3:32	comment	added	Wrythe		You are saying that the decision to write in hiragana / katakana/ kanji depends on context. That is correct. But, my point is that, where there is absolutely no context, I have 2 animals, out of a list of 20 animals, written in katakana (all others are hiragana). Your saying that the decision to use katakana depends on context does not answer the question.
Jun 11, 2015 at 3:21	comment	added	chocolate♦		海驢、海豹、膃肭臍、水黽...　こんなもん読めるかっ！ｗｗｗ
Jun 11, 2015 at 1:41	history	edited	The Wandering Coder	CC BY-SA 3.0	added 205 characters in body
Jun 11, 2015 at 1:31	history	answered	The Wandering Coder	CC BY-SA 3.0