Timeline for What is the formal way to say "しょっちゅう"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2015 at 17:57 | vote | accept | Wrythe | ||
| May 29, 2015 at 8:29 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackJapanese/status/604202807722385408 | ||
| May 28, 2015 at 1:02 | answer | added | norio | timeline score: 2 | |
| May 28, 2015 at 0:50 | history | edited | user1478 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 7 characters in body; edited tags
|
| May 28, 2015 at 0:09 | comment | added | user1478 | @natlang よく is sometimes used in formal documents in certain meanings of the word. Here's a random example: 「事象叙述と属性叙述の違いはこれまでも、海外では状態述語における stage-level predicates(場面レベル述語)と individual-level predicates(個体レベル述語)の区別(Carlson 1980、 Krifka et al. 1995)として形式意味論でよく知られており、また、我が国では佐久間(1941)の示唆を発展させた益岡(1987,2004)、益岡(編)(2008)で叙述の類型として論じられているが、その区別が統語構造と形態構造の「形」にどのような影響をもたらすかという問題はほとんど手がつけられていない。」 (Source) But this isn't the same use of よく you're asking about. | |
| May 27, 2015 at 23:37 | vote | accept | Wrythe | ||
| May 27, 2015 at 23:37 | |||||
| May 27, 2015 at 22:48 | answer | added | jhenn | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 27, 2015 at 20:05 | comment | added | Wrythe | @Sqrtbottle "よく"? Definitely not "よく". A more refined and interesting word might be preferred. In fact, I'm pretty sure "よく" is not used that much in formal documents (unless the context is where the "よく" is understood to be the author's observation). Other than editorials, or whatever, I don't think you'd see "よく". BUT.... I could be wrong about that. | |
| May 27, 2015 at 19:00 | comment | added | sqrtbottle | Couldn't you just use よく? | |
| May 27, 2015 at 18:25 | history | asked | Wrythe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |