Timeline for Why is the order of bottom-left radicals different for some kanji?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2019 at 18:35 | vote | accept | Lou | ||
| May 11, 2015 at 10:15 | comment | added | broccoli forest | No, it's a book in my college's library, where I was there today. I didn't note down the title, but it must be this one. | |
| May 11, 2015 at 8:04 | comment | added | sqrtbottle | Makes sense to me now. Good pictures, by the way. Do you have a copy of the book? | |
| May 11, 2015 at 5:30 | comment | added | broccoli forest | @Sqrtbottle Yes, it is. That's not what I tried to deny. My argument is that left-sided 辵 isn't the direct ancestor of ⻌ but left-and-bottom 辵 is. Please see my newly uploaded pics, where ⻌ is already written mostly L-shaped in Warring States period, while 走 is not. | |
| May 11, 2015 at 5:24 | history | edited | broccoli forest | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 219 characters in body
|
| May 10, 2015 at 11:51 | comment | added | sqrtbottle | Is 辵 not just that same combination of 彳 + 止? What makes the origins of 辵 different to ⻌, or could they not be called different versions of the same character / radical (as they are in most Chinese dictionaries)? | |
| May 10, 2015 at 2:11 | history | edited | broccoli forest | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 51 characters in body
|
| May 10, 2015 at 0:15 | history | answered | broccoli forest | CC BY-SA 3.0 |