Return to Answer

Recently, @naruto mentioned the phrase 頭が赤い魚を食べた猫, which can be understood in many ways. There is some ambiguity in how each word relates to each other.

Among other possibilities, it could mean

• [(頭が赤い)魚]を食べた猫 (red-headed fish)
• [(頭が赤い)+(魚を食べた)]猫 (red-headed cat)

The same applies here. Consider the following pattern:

ＡとＢとＣのＤ

As far as logic and grammar is concerned, this can be interpreted as either one of these possibilities:

1. (ＡとＢとＣ)のＤ
2. (ＡとＢ)と(ＣのＤ)
3. Ａと[(ＢとＣ)のＤ]

Note that A, B, C, and D can be nouns or noun phrases. If the latter, it could get even more confusing, so I won't consider this case.

Usually context resolves the ambiguity and makes it obvious. For the example you gave, that would be possibility (3): the difference between certain kinds of vegetables.

To illustrate the point, let me give some examples for each possibility.

(《》 markers added by me for clarity)

①:

• 《せりとレタスとキャベツ》の違い
• 《ブランデーと梅酒と柑橘【かんきつ】ジャム》の大人[珈琲]【コーヒー】
• garden COLORING BOOK 《小鳥と花と動物》のぬり絵
• 《君と彼女と彼女》の恋

②:

• 勇者と少女と《変化の指輪》
• 「使命」と「運命」と「人生の意味」
• 僕と君と《夜空の星》
• 星杯騎士団【グラールリッター】と七耀教会【しちようきょうかい】と《黒【くろ】の史書【ししょ】》
• コナンと平次【へいじ】と《恋の暗号》

③:

Note the first sentence.

• [ポスドク]【postdoctor(al)】問題と《アメリカと日本の違い》
• 下妻物語【しもつまものがたり】と《ウルルと森の物語》
• 竹取物語【たけとりものがたり】と《伊邪那岐命【いざなぎのみこと】の伊邪那美命【いざなみのみこと】の物語》
• 《伊邪那岐命【イザナギノミコト】と伊邪那美命【イザナミノミコト】の夫婦神》と《伊邪那岐命と伊邪那美命の争いを仲裁した菊理媛大神【ククリヒメノオオカミ】》が祀られている
• 和風レシピと《梅酒と梅干しの作り方》

I had a hard time coming up with examples for case ③, but it's definitely possible.

To summarize, only context and common sense can tell you what の applies to, it depends on what the nouns or noun phrases A, B, C, and D are.

Lastly, if you really wanted to leave no ambiguity, you could resort to a lengthy phrase that says it explicitly, such as せりとレタスとキャベツという3つの(野菜・植物)の違い.

Recently, @naruto mentioned the phrase 頭が赤い魚を食べた猫, which can be understood in many ways. There is some ambiguity in how each word relates to each other.

Among other possibilities, it could mean

• [(頭が赤い)魚]を食べた猫 (red-headed fish)
• [(頭が赤い)+(魚を食べた)]猫 (red-headed cat)

The same applies here. Consider the following pattern:

ＡとＢとＣのＤ

As far as logic and grammar is concerned, this can be interpreted as either one of these possibilities:

1. (ＡとＢとＣ)のＤ
2. (ＡとＢ)と(ＣのＤ)
3. Ａと[(ＢとＣ)のＤ]

Note that A, B, C, and D can be nouns or noun phrases. If the latter, it could get even more confusing, so I won't consider this case.

Usually context resolves the ambiguity and makes it obvious. For the example you gave, that would be possibility (3): the difference between certain kinds of vegetables.

To illustrate the point, let me give some examples for each possibility.

(《》 markers added by me for clarity)

①:

• 《せりとレタスとキャベツ》の違い
• 《ブランデーと梅酒と柑橘【かんきつ】ジャム》の大人[珈琲]【コーヒー】
• garden COLORING BOOK 《小鳥と花と動物》のぬり絵
• 《君と彼女と彼女》の恋

②:

• 勇者と少女と《変化の指輪》
• 「使命」と「運命」と「人生の意味」
• 僕と君と《夜空の星》
• 星杯騎士団【グラールリッター】と七耀教会【しちようきょうかい】と《黒【くろ】の史書【ししょ】》
• コナンと平次【へいじ】と《恋の暗号》

③:

Note the first sentence.

• [ポスドク]【postdoctor(al)】問題と《アメリカと日本の違い》
• 下妻物語【しもつまものがたり】と《ウルルと森の物語》
• 竹取物語【たけとりものがたり】と《伊邪那岐命【いざなぎのみこと】の伊邪那美命【いざなみのみこと】の物語》
• 《伊邪那岐命【イザナギノミコト】と伊邪那美命【イザナミノミコト】の夫婦神》と《伊邪那岐命と伊邪那美命の争いを仲裁した菊理媛大神【ククリヒメノオオカミ】》が祀られている
• 和風レシピと《梅酒と梅干しの作り方》

I had a hard time coming up with examples for case ③, but it's definitely possible.

To summarize, only context and common sense can tell you what の applies to, it depends on what the nouns or noun phrases A, B, C, and D are.

Lastly, if you really wanted to leave no ambiguity, you could resort to a lengthy phrase that says it explicitly, such as せりとレタスとキャベツという3つの(野菜・植物)の違い.

Recently, @naruto mentioned the phrase 頭が赤い魚を食べた猫, which can be understood in many ways. There is some ambiguity in how each word relates to each other.

Among other possibilities, it could mean

• [(頭が赤い)魚]を食べた猫 (red-headed fish)
• [(頭が赤い)+(魚を食べた)]猫 (red-headed cat)

The same applies here. Consider the following pattern:

ＡとＢとＣのＤ

As far as logic and grammar is concerned, this can be interpreted as either one of these possibilities:

1. (ＡとＢとＣ)のＤ
2. (ＡとＢ)と(ＣのＤ)
3. Ａと[(ＢとＣ)のＤ]

Note that A, B, C, and D can be nouns or noun phrases. If the latter, it could get even more confusing, so I won't consider this case.

Usually context resolves the ambiguity and makes it obvious. For the example you gave, that would be possibility (3): the difference between certain kinds of vegetables.

To illustrate the point, let me give some examples for each possibility.

(《》 markers added by me for clarity)

①:

• 《せりとレタスとキャベツ》の違い
• 《ブランデーと梅酒と柑橘【かんきつ】ジャム》の大人[珈琲]【コーヒー】
• garden COLORING BOOK 《小鳥と花と動物》のぬり絵
• 《君と彼女と彼女》の恋

②:

• 勇者と少女と《変化の指輪》
• 「使命」と「運命」と「人生の意味」
• 僕と君と《夜空の星》
• 星杯騎士団【グラールリッター】と七耀教会【しちようきょうかい】と《黒【くろ】の史書【ししょ】》
• コナンと平次【へいじ】と《恋の暗号》

③:

Note the first sentence.

• [ポスドク]【postdoctor(al)】問題と《アメリカと日本の違い》
• 下妻物語【しもつまものがたり】と《ウルルと森の物語》
• 竹取物語【たけとりものがたり】と《伊邪那岐命【いざなぎのみこと》の伊邪那美命《いざなみのみこと】の物語》
• 《伊邪那岐命【イザナギノミコト】と伊邪那美命【イザナミノミコト】の夫婦神》と《伊邪那岐命と伊邪那美命の争いを仲裁した菊理媛大神【ククリヒメノオオカミ】》が祀られている
• 和風レシピと《梅酒と梅干しの作り方》
• だが、忘れてはならない。それは、数多のアークスの流した無念の涙と、血と汗の結晶、即ちリアルマネーの投入という犠牲のもとに成り立っているのだということを。

I had a hard time coming up with examples for case ③, but it's definitely possible.

To summarize, only context and common sense can tell you what の applies to, it depends on what the nouns or noun phrases A, B, C, and D are.

Lastly, if you really wanted to leave no ambiguity, you could resort to a lengthy phrase that says it explicitly, such as せりとレタスとキャベツという3つの(野菜・植物)の違い.

Recently, @naruto mentioned the phrase 頭が赤い魚を食べた猫, which can be understood in many ways. There is some ambiguity in how each word relates to each other.

Among other possibilities, it could mean

• [(頭が赤い)魚]を食べた猫 (red-headed fish)
• [(頭が赤い)+(魚を食べた)]猫 (red-headed cat)

The same applies here. Consider the following pattern:

ＡとＢとＣのＤ

As far as logic and grammar is concerned, this can be interpreted as either one of these possibilities:

1. (ＡとＢとＣ)のＤ
2. (ＡとＢ)と(ＣのＤ)
3. Ａと[(ＢとＣ)のＤ]

Note that A, B, C, and D can be nouns or noun phrases. If the latter, it could get even more confusing, so I won't consider this case.

Usually context resolves the ambiguity and makes it obvious. For the example you gave, that would be possibility (3): the difference between certain kinds of vegetables.

To illustrate the point, let me give some examples for each possibility.

(《》 markers added by me for clarity)

①:

• 《せりとレタスとキャベツ》の違い
• 《ブランデーと梅酒と柑橘【かんきつ】ジャム》の大人[珈琲]【コーヒー】
• garden COLORING BOOK 《小鳥と花と動物》のぬり絵
• 《君と彼女と彼女》の恋

②:

• 勇者と少女と《変化の指輪》
• 「使命」と「運命」と「人生の意味」
• 僕と君と《夜空の星》
• 星杯騎士団【グラールリッター】と七耀教会【しちようきょうかい】と《黒【くろ】の史書【ししょ】》
• コナンと平次【へいじ】と《恋の暗号》

③:

Note the first sentence.

• [ポスドク]【postdoctor(al)】問題と《アメリカと日本の違い》
• 下妻物語【しもつまものがたり】と《ウルルと森の物語》
• 竹取物語【たけとりものがたり】と《伊邪那岐命【いざなぎのみこと】の伊邪那美命【いざなみのみこと】の物語》
• 《伊邪那岐命【イザナギノミコト】と伊邪那美命【イザナミノミコト】の夫婦神》と《伊邪那岐命と伊邪那美命の争いを仲裁した菊理媛大神【ククリヒメノオオカミ】》が祀られている
• 和風レシピと《梅酒と梅干しの作り方》

I had a hard time coming up with examples for case ③, but it's definitely possible.

To summarize, only context and common sense can tell you what の applies to, it depends on what the nouns or noun phrases A, B, C, and D are.

Lastly, if you really wanted to leave no ambiguity, you could resort to a lengthy phrase that says it explicitly, such as せりとレタスとキャベツという3つの(野菜・植物)の違い.

Recently, @naruto mentioned the phrase 頭が赤い魚を食べた猫, which can be understood in many ways. There is some ambiguity in how each word relates to each other.

Among other possibilities, it could mean

• [(頭が赤い)魚]を食べた猫 (red-headed fish)
• [(頭が赤い)+(魚を食べた)]猫 (red-headed cat)

The same applies here. Consider the following pattern:

ＡとＢとＣのＤ

As far as logic and grammar is concerned, this can be interpreted as either one of these possibilities:

1. (ＡとＢとＣ)のＤ
2. (ＡとＢ)と(ＣのＤ)
3. Ａと[(ＢとＣ)のＤ]

Note that A, B, C, and D can be nouns or noun phrases. If the latter, it could get even more confusing, so I won't consider this case.

Usually context resolves the ambiguity and makes it obvious. For the example you gave, that would be possibility (3): the difference between certain kinds of vegetables.

To illustrate the point, let me give some examples for each possibility.

(《》 markers added by me for clarity)

①:

• 《せりとレタスとキャベツ》の違い
• 《ブランデーと梅酒と柑橘【かんきつ】ジャム》の大人[珈琲]【コーヒー】
• garden COLORING BOOK 《小鳥と花と動物》のぬり絵
• 《君と彼女と彼女》の恋

②:

• 勇者と少女と《変化の指輪》
• 「使命」と「運命」と「人生の意味」
• 僕と君と《夜空の星》
• 星杯騎士団【グラールリッター】と七耀教会【しちようきょうかい】と《黒【くろ】の史書【ししょ】》
• コナンと平次【へいじ】と《恋の暗号》

③:

Note the first sentence.

• [ポスドク]【postdoctor(al)】問題と《アメリカと日本の違い》
• 下妻物語【しもつまものがたり】と《ウルルと森の物語》
• 竹取物語【たけとりものがたり】と《伊邪那岐命【いざなぎのみこと》の伊邪那美命《いざなみのみこと】の物語》
• 《伊邪那岐命【イザナギノミコト】と伊邪那美命【イザナミノミコト】の夫婦神》と《伊邪那岐命と伊邪那美命の争いを仲裁した菊理媛大神【ククリヒメノオオカミ】》が祀られている
• 和風レシピと《梅酒と梅干しの作り方》
• だが、忘れてはならない。それは、数多のアークスの流した無念の涙と、血と汗の結晶、即ちリアルマネーの投入という犠牲のもとに成り立っているのだということを。

I had a hard time coming up with examples for case ③, but it's definitely possible.

To summarize, only context and common sense can tell you what の applies to, it depends on what the nouns or noun phrases A, B, C, and D are.

Recently, @naruto mentioned the phrase 頭が赤い魚を食べた猫, which can be understood in many ways. There is some ambiguity in how each word relates to each other.

Among other possibilities, it could mean

• [(頭が赤い)魚]を食べた猫 (red-headed fish)
• [(頭が赤い)+(魚を食べた)]猫 (red-headed cat)

The same applies here. Consider the following pattern:

ＡとＢとＣのＤ

As far as logic and grammar is concerned, this can be interpreted as either one of these possibilities:

1. (ＡとＢとＣ)のＤ
2. (ＡとＢ)と(ＣのＤ)
3. Ａと[(ＢとＣ)のＤ]

Note that A, B, C, and D can be nouns or noun phrases. If the latter, it could get even more confusing, so I won't consider this case.

Usually context resolves the ambiguity and makes it obvious. For the example you gave, that would be possibility (3): the difference between certain kinds of vegetables.

To illustrate the point, let me give some examples for each possibility.

(《》 markers added by me for clarity)

①:

• 《せりとレタスとキャベツ》の違い
• 《ブランデーと梅酒と柑橘【かんきつ】ジャム》の大人[珈琲]【コーヒー】
• garden COLORING BOOK 《小鳥と花と動物》のぬり絵
• 《君と彼女と彼女》の恋

②:

• 勇者と少女と《変化の指輪》
• 「使命」と「運命」と「人生の意味」
• 僕と君と《夜空の星》
• 星杯騎士団【グラールリッター】と七耀教会【しちようきょうかい】と《黒【くろ】の史書【ししょ】》
• コナンと平次【へいじ】と《恋の暗号》

③:

Note the first sentence.

• [ポスドク]【postdoctor(al)】問題と《アメリカと日本の違い》
• 下妻物語【しもつまものがたり】と《ウルルと森の物語》
• 竹取物語【たけとりものがたり】と《伊邪那岐命【いざなぎのみこと》の伊邪那美命《いざなみのみこと】の物語》
• 《伊邪那岐命【イザナギノミコト】と伊邪那美命【イザナミノミコト】の夫婦神》と《伊邪那岐命と伊邪那美命の争いを仲裁した菊理媛大神【ククリヒメノオオカミ】》が祀られている
• 和風レシピと《梅酒と梅干しの作り方》
• だが、忘れてはならない。それは、数多のアークスの流した無念の涙と、血と汗の結晶、即ちリアルマネーの投入という犠牲のもとに成り立っているのだということを。

I had a hard time coming up with examples for case ③, but it's definitely possible.

To summarize, only context and common sense can tell you what の applies to, it depends on what the nouns or noun phrases A, B, C, and D are.

Lastly, if you really wanted to leave no ambiguity, you could resort to a lengthy phrase that says it explicitly, such as せりとレタスとキャベツという3つの(野菜・植物)の違い.