Timeline for What is the radical of 全? 人 or 入?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2014 at 20:43 | vote | accept | 3 to 5 business days | ||
| Jul 27, 2014 at 19:22 | history | edited | user1478 |
edited tags
|
|
| Jul 27, 2014 at 17:36 | comment | added | istrasci | As @user3306356 mentions, I'm more inclined to think it's ひと just based on the stroke order. | |
| Jul 27, 2014 at 16:21 | comment | added | virmaior | @3to5businessdays - if I remember correctly the notes about kanjidic are that the ones in kanjidic were picked just by looking at the kanji... | |
| Jul 27, 2014 at 15:56 | answer | added | user1478 | timeline score: 9 | |
| Jul 27, 2014 at 15:46 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackJapanese/status/493422115052597249 | ||
| Jul 27, 2014 at 15:31 | comment | added | 3 to 5 business days | @Choko huh, thanks for bringing that up. Unlike stroke order, I was always under the impression that radicals are consistent between references (except for Kanjidic). Apparently that's not the case. | |
| Jul 27, 2014 at 15:00 | answer | added | Tim | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jul 27, 2014 at 14:40 | answer | added | Mou某 | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jul 27, 2014 at 14:13 | comment | added | user1016 | Wikiによれば・・・「新字体の部首は『康熙字典』のような統一的な基準がないため、各漢和辞典によって部首が異なることもある。」だそうです・・・(関係なかったらすいません) | |
| Jul 27, 2014 at 13:14 | history | asked | 3 to 5 business days | CC BY-SA 3.0 |