Timeline for 推量の助詞、「う」... does this particle exist?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 14, 2014 at 23:48 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackJapanese/status/444621200502050816 | ||
Mar 12, 2014 at 11:03 | comment | added | user1478 |
@Nathan Last time you brought this up, I linked to these three definitions. This question is interesting, though, because 助動詞 inflect but う does not, and because (in my opinion) it's hard to come up with a good argument against considering the entire oː suffix a single morpheme in modern Japanese.
|
|
Mar 12, 2014 at 10:59 | vote | accept | Nathan | ||
Mar 12, 2014 at 10:50 | answer | added | Yang Muye | timeline score: 6 | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 10:28 | comment | added | Nathan | Hey, why the downvote? TokyoNagoya that sounds intriguing, could you elaborate? | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 10:21 | comment | added | user4032 | No, that particle does not exist because it is an auxiliary verb, not a particle. | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 9:57 | comment | added | Robin | dictionary.goo.ne.jp/leaf/jn2/17145/m0u/%E3%81%86 | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 9:51 | history | asked | Nathan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |