Skip to main content
20 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 6, 2013 at 5:40 review Reopen votes
Feb 8, 2013 at 3:02
Feb 6, 2013 at 5:20 comment added Mechanical snail @DaveMG: I disagree. While being art gives singers artistic license to pronounce it however best suits the song, there exist linguistic conventions that get applied by default. To compare, you can have constructive questions on rhyming conventions in English, as while poets sometimes do use slant rhyme, rhyming is mostly governed by real phonology. This is basically the same. This particular question is in principle answerable more definitively than with "lists of various things that individuals have heard" by finding examples that appear in multiple places, or by finding studies or surveys.
Feb 5, 2013 at 6:41 comment added Questioner Sorry, I voted to close because no matter how well the question is phrased, singing is an art, which means that the decisions about pronunciation (or anything else) that any one singer might make are completely open to their personal interpretation (and culture... and style...etc...) and can't be codified. Answers can only be long lists of various things that individuals have heard in songs they've listened to, but without any way to verify how common, pervasive, or standard they might be. This question would be answered more accurately, and be more fun, with practical karaoke experimentation.
Feb 5, 2013 at 6:33 history closed istrasci
Dono
ssb
fefe
Questioner
not constructive
Feb 3, 2013 at 16:35 comment added crayondraw @snailplane No, at first I was quite confused but in the end I think you made my question simpler, but probably more effective and less confusing. I will try to get better on the front of format and description, Thanks.
Feb 3, 2013 at 12:41 comment added user1478 Rather than vote to close, I tried to improve the question. Please feel free to roll my changes back if you think they were out of line.
Feb 3, 2013 at 12:41 history edited user1478 CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 846 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
Feb 3, 2013 at 6:51 vote accept crayondraw
Feb 2, 2013 at 3:14 comment added crayondraw @user18597 Although ironically that just points out that there is no standardisation (or little of it) it was very clarifying, thanks you
Feb 2, 2013 at 3:12 comment added user18597 I really don't think there are such "rules" so that we can answer this. For example, listen to this: youtube.com/watch?v=557LCPYdqvA Every "devoiced vowel" in the song, from start to finish, is voiced. As hi ta e isoge / Nokos hi ta mono wa / Mit su kete kureru. It just depends on the singer and style.
S Feb 2, 2013 at 1:56 history suggested user18597 CC BY-SA 3.0
I would suggest a shorter title for this question.
Feb 2, 2013 at 1:43 review Suggested edits
S Feb 2, 2013 at 1:56
Feb 2, 2013 at 0:46 history edited crayondraw CC BY-SA 3.0
added 192 characters in body
Feb 2, 2013 at 0:31 answer added ithisa timeline score: 4
Feb 2, 2013 at 0:28 comment added user1478 Possibly related: japanese.stackexchange.com/questions/3540/…
Feb 1, 2013 at 22:48 review Close votes
Feb 5, 2013 at 6:37
Feb 1, 2013 at 22:46 comment added Tsuyoshi Ito You are welcome. Correction in my previous comment: muted vowels → mute vowels.
Feb 1, 2013 at 22:45 comment added crayondraw @TsuyoshiIto I'm really sorry about including so many questions in that section, it was a confusing thing but thanks for the link!
Feb 1, 2013 at 22:40 comment added Tsuyoshi Ito That is a lot of questions! At least, as for “aishteru,” it is called muted vowels or devoiced vowels, and this phenomenon is not specific to songs. See this question and other questions listed under “Linked” on the right of that webpage.
Feb 1, 2013 at 22:07 history asked crayondraw CC BY-SA 3.0