Take the 2-minute tour ×
Japanese Language Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for students, teachers, and linguists wanting to discuss the finer points of the Japanese language. It's 100% free, no registration required.

As time goes on in our age of increasing reliance on computerized kanji input, this question may become increasingly irrelevant, but when I'm writing a sentence with (gasp!) pen and paper, I have always struggled to remember where the dividing line between kanji and okurigana lies with each character. Is there any way (aside from brute-force memorization, which I'm attempting at the moment) to learn and reliably recall okurigana? Are there any patterns I can rely on?

share|improve this question
add comment

4 Answers

up vote 6 down vote accepted

Other than brute-force memorization (棒暗記), the only thing I can suggest is material regarding the Kanji-Kentei (漢検), because I know some of the (lower?) levels focus on 送り仮名. Some materials I have are books of tests from previous years (問題集), and a Nintendo DS 漢検 game. However, I got all of this in Japan, so I don't know how accessible this kind of stuff would be for you (Amazon.co.jp, have friends from Japan send you stuff, etc.) There's always Google to maybe search for some online 送り仮名 quizzes.

For い-adjective, of course the い is always 送り仮名. There are also the 〜やか/〜らか type adjectives, where that suffix is always 送り仮名 as well.

Learning verbs by their dictionary form will also help. Note however, that there are often times where multiple forms of 送り仮名 are accepted. For example, the verb とらわれる can be written both as 捕らわれる and 捕われる. This can throw a kink into some verbs, but I think the ratio of multiple-accepted-送り仮名 verbs to one-accepted-送り仮名 is probably pretty low.

share|improve this answer
    
There is 漢検 アプリ on iPad btw. –  YOU Jun 7 '11 at 15:48
    
There's at least one exception to your い-adjective rule and that's the small class of たい-adjectives such as (重たい). There might be more, but I can't think of any right now. –  Boaz Yaniv Jun 7 '11 at 18:07
1  
Just realized there's a much more widely used class than that: all the adjectives ending in しい. :) –  Boaz Yaniv Jun 7 '11 at 18:45
    
I've been thinking of trying my hand at the 漢検 for a couple of years now, so I'll see if I can get my hands on some of the study tools you mentioned. –  Derek Schaab Jun 13 '11 at 12:29
add comment

The gist: There is a kind of computerized kanji input system that puts you back in charge of which letter to write in Kanji and which one in Kana. Namely, SKK. With SKK, you can actively learn okurigana rules even when writing text on the computer.

Basically, SKK converts words one by one (single-word conversion), without analysing syntax or grammar. Instead, users specify the border between Kanjis and Kanas. This means you can write dialects, written or spoken words, ancient words as well as standard words in the same manner. (From SKK Features)

The disclaimer: While I have been using SKK for 8 years now, I haven't intentionally used it for the purpose of learning okurigana. So I can't testify that SKK will improve your okurigana skills, nor do I have any study data on that matter.

The why: That said, SKK gives you the environment to actively and constantly engage in the act of deciding the okurigana, which can help you get better with it. This is just like pen-and-paper writing on the computer, but with instant feedback from the system.

The example:

a → あ

a, → あ、

a,O → あ、▽お

a,Oku → あ、▽おく

a,OkuR → あ、▽おく*r

a,OkuRi → あ、▼送り

a,OkuRiG → あ、送り▽g

a,OkuRiGa → あ、送り▽が

a,OkuRiGana → あ、送り▽がな

a,OkuRiGanaSpace → あ、送り▼仮名

a,OkuRiGanaSpaceEnter → あ、送り仮名

AquaSKK's "making the switch" article (ja) also has a good fleshed out example.

The caveat: SKK's okurigana dictionary lists extra forms alongside with standardized forms. If you want to restrict the acceptable okuriganas to standardized forms only, you need to find or create a dictionary file with extra forms weeded out.

Where to get it: There are various versions of SKK for several operating systems. You can check out the Japanese Wikipedia article for a comprehensive list.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Why force it at all? Simply expose yourself to the language (reading, etc) and let nature take its course.

I like learning new vocabulary via study-methods as much as the next guy, but learning to actually use the words comes best from seeing/hearing them in use.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Since the kanji part of both verbs and adjective is the part conveying the root meaning of this particular adjective form, the okurigana (i.e. everything that follows the part written in kanji) is rarely composed of anything else except for derivation and conjugation suffixes.

Conjugation suffixes are easy enough, and I doubt they pose any problem for you. You know that the たかった in 見たかった is the part that changes by conjugation, it definitely has to be part of the okurigana. All other forms of the verb 見る wouldn't give you any problem either.

I guess your problem really begins when you get to verbs like 変える and 帰る. Both look essentially the same in their Rentaikei (base) forms, and in both only the last syllable (る) changes - so why is the え in 変える spelled out in the okurigana, while it is considered part of the Kanji in 帰る?

The answer for that is that the え here is part of the derivational suffix. If we look at the verb's history, then it's original stem was actually kap-, from which both kaperu (written かへる in old spelling and かえる today) and kaparu (written かはる in old spelling and かわる today) are derived. As you can see, two different derivational suffixes have been attached to this verbal root to create the transitive (kaperu) and intransitive (kaparu) versions of the verb.

These origin of these derivational suffixes may be a bit obscure nowadays, but it's still easy to recognize the difference between 変える and 帰る by just comparing them to their counterpart verbs written with the same kanji: 変わる and 帰す. You can see that in 変わる the two last syllables change and in 帰す only the last syllable changes. That's why writing down the derivational suffixes in okurigana is still relevant even today: because these parts of the verb still change.

Now, it should be noted here (and it was already noted by istrasci, in fact) that some verbs have more than one acceptable okurigana. Looking at older texts, it seems to me that the standardization of okurigana is actually quite recent, so we naturally have quite a few exceptions, whether they are officially (or semi-officialy) accepted or not. But these exceptions to the rule shouldn't bother you most of the time, since all it really means is that you have an extra form, for which the derivational suffixes aren't fully spelled out in okurigana (e.g. 捕われる, which derives from 捕る) - the other form (with fully spelled out derivational suffixes) is still accepted, and usually it's also the more common one.

As for い-"adjectives", they are a bit easier (like istrasci has noted), since they are less often derived, but you should pay attention to the cases where such adjectives are derived. They're usually easy to detect because of the ending: adjectives ending with ない (such as 少ない and もったいない/勿体ない, but not 汚い), たい (重たい) and しい (悲しい、親しい).

share|improve this answer
    
So basically any part of the suffix that changes has to be included in the okurigana, which means you need to know all the alternate suffixes to establish a minimum "baseline" okurigana. Hmm. Sounds like there's still a lot of memorization involved, but these are good points to keep in mind. –  Derek Schaab Jun 13 '11 at 12:33
    
@Derek: I don't know. I never seemed to have any trouble with okurigana when writing. I did have lots of trouble with kanji of course, so it might just be a matter of proportion. Anyway I think that you already know intuitively the transitive-intransitive-causative groups of all verbs you're familiar with. And for most non-verb words, okurigana is quite trivial. –  Boaz Yaniv Jun 13 '11 at 19:49
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.