Take the 2-minute tour ×
Japanese Language Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for students, teachers, and linguists wanting to discuss the finer points of the Japanese language. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Recently I was introduced to the 四字熟語【よじじゅくご】:


... to describe the type of changing weather one often experiences around late Winter/early Spring.

As to the literal meaning of this expression (and where it came from):

The 寒 and 温 in this expression are fairly obvious. For the 三 and 四, I automatically assumed a construction similar to the famous idiom: 七転び八起き【ななころびやおき】, where the "8" merely means "one more time than 7" and therefore something like "for every time you fall you get up, and then one".

With that perspective, 三寒四温 would be (very roughly) something like: "for every time it gets cold, it gets warm again". At any rate: some idea of a back-and-forth (ending on warm).

However, Wikipedia gives a completely different explanation:


In their definition, the "3" and "4" correspond to somewhat specific durations, and together make a "one-week cycle" of cold and warm characteristic of the season.

As much as I hate to question a Japanese Wikipedia page, this seems surprisingly specific and does not sound particularly grounded in any scientific or folk theory I have ever heard of. The reference links on the Wikipedia page are more illustrations than explanations and not helpful there.

Has anybody ever heard of this expression and its possible origins? Is there any substance to this "one-week cycle" of late Winter in older Japanese folklore?

share|improve this question
Following some links from the page you mention, it says that the word originates from North Eastern China or Northern Korea to describe the winter climate where anticyclones from from Syberia strengthen and weakens in 7-day cycle, and that it is actually rarely literally observed in Japan. –  sawa Mar 12 '12 at 3:37
Hmm, I always thought the "3" was March and "4" was April. –  istrasci Mar 12 '12 at 15:00
@Dave: 七転八起 is also read しちてんはっき in its 四字熟語 form. FYI in case you (or anyone else reading this post) didn't know. –  istrasci Mar 12 '12 at 15:07
@sawa: I must have missed that. Would you mind making your comment a reply (and if possible, include a copy-paste of the text)? istrasci: had not even occurred to me. But if you know of any sources going that direction, it's an interesting idea... –  Dave Mar 12 '12 at 16:48
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 3 down vote accepted

On this webpage by Japan Airlines, it says that the word originates from North Eastern China or Northern Korea to describe the winter climate where anticyclones from Syberia strengthens and weakens in a 7-day cycle, causing repetition of cold and warm days:

冬の時期に寒い日が3日くらい続くと、そのあとに比較的暖かい日が4日続くという意味の言葉で、寒暖の周期を表しています。 もとは中国の東北部や朝鮮半島北部で冬の気候を表す言葉として用いられました。冬のシベリア高気圧から吹き出す寒気が7日ぐらいの周期で、強まったり弱まったりすることに由来する言葉とされています[。]

And it further says that it is actually rarely literally observed in Japan, and in recent Japanese, this word is used to describe early Spring rather than Winter, departing from its original usage:

実際に日本では3日間寒い日が続いたあとに、4日間暖かい日が続くという周期が現れることはほとんどないのです。 ... その後、[この言葉は]日本に伝わりました。 ... 最近では ... 本来使われる冬ではなく、春先に使われることが多くなっています。日本では、早春に低気圧と高気圧が交互にやってきて、低気圧が通過し寒気が流れ込んで寒くなった後、今度は高気圧に覆われて暖かくなり、周期的な気温の変化を繰り返すことが多くなります。このため、日本では寒暖の変化がはっきりと現れる春先にこの言葉を用いる人が多くなったと考えられます。

share|improve this answer
Following Dave, I ended up doing a copy and paste, but I actually do not like to do that. That is why it was originally a comment rather than an answer. Doing a web search and copying and paste as if it is your answer is too stupid. Too many of the answers posted on this website are like that. Those answers make me question: "Is this website a portal website?", "Is this website a collection of links to Wikipedia", or "Is this website meant to be another Google?" What I think should be an answer is something that tells what you have known regarding the question asked. –  sawa Mar 12 '12 at 17:24
Obviously, this is not the perfect place to discuss it (so if my answer does not satisfy you, let's move it to Meta, please), but in a nutshell: 1) some questions are bound to be answered appropriately somewhere else online and there is no good reason to reinvent the wheel there 2) in many cases, it is nicer to have references rather than an authoritative argument 3) in cases where an external source is used to answer, SE policy strongly encourages to copy-paste the relevant part in order to not be dependent on URL persistence... –  Dave Mar 13 '12 at 13:55
add comment

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.