Why is gaikokujin more politically correct than gaijin?

Question

While in English, the word "gaijin" is far more common than "gaikokujin", I've heard that in Japanese [外人]{がいじん} has been replaced by [外国人]{がいこくじん} for reasons of political correctness.

What differences are there between the two words?

1. Is it merely replacing one word with another, a case of a euphemism treadmill?
2. Is the former perceived as a contraction of the latter, though Wikipedia claims that the former word pre-dated the latter? Contractions are often seen as derogatory.
3. Does the latter emphasize that it's nationality that's being talked about, rather than race?

Answer 1

You've stepped on a potential land mine of debate there. Whether or not 外人{がいじん} is offensive, politically incorrect, or means something other than just "foreigner" is the topic of a lot of heated debate. Take a look here for the "gaijin is offensive side". Take a look at the Wikipidia entry for links to the "gaijin is just a word" side.

Which means that for starters, it can't simply be taken as axiomatic that 外国人{がいこくじん} is more politically correct, which makes answering your question a little tough.

As far as I know, NHK and news programs favour the use of 外国人{がいこくじん} over 外人{がいじん} because it is considered more politically correct. However, if you look at the links in this answer, 外人{がいじん} does not seem to be on the list of "unbroadcastable" words (although the lists linked to are unofficial, so perhaps broadcasters have their own in house rules).

The Wikipedia entry you (and I) link to covers a lot of the history and two sides of the issue, so there's no need to retread them here.

I think that for the purposes of this site and wondering about usage in Japanese, you can't be given hard rules on this one. I think the guidelines you need to consider are:

1. Some people do find it offensive, so know your audience.

2. Most Japanese are unaware that it is an issue, simply because foreigners in Japan are such a tiny minority that most issues relating to foreigner relations go under the radar for most Japanese.

3. Whether offensive or not, the word is most often understood to mean non-Chinese, non-Korean foreigners.

---

Personally, I feel it is too simplistic to simply assert that a word like 外人{がいじん} is or is not offensive. People seem to want to put the entire burden of responsibility on either the speaker or listener, on intent or perception, but I believe language is a relationship in which two parties participate in understanding. So 外人{がいじん} can be made offensive, or not, it can be understood as offensive, or not. If you and I were having coffee together, I could show you how I can take a neutral word like "woman" and use it as a weapon. But that becomes part of a broader debate about language and social norms. Too broad to cover here.

Answer 2

外人 means "outsiders" or "strangers", not necessarily foreigners. When this word is used against foreigners, the point of view is set to Japan, and it is presupposed that anything that belongs to outside of Japan, or anything that came from outside of Japan is an "outside(r)" or a "strange(er)". On the other hand, 外国人 means "people from a foreign country" or "foreigners", and it is appropriate to use it against foreigners. It does not have the negative implications mentioned above that 外人 has. 外人 is not shortened form of 外国人, although some people mistake it as so. They overlap, but are not the same. 外人 hasn't been replaced by 外国人, but over the recent time, more people became aware of the misuse and came to use the correct word.