Take the 2-minute tour ×
Japanese Language Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for students, teachers, and linguists wanting to discuss the finer points of the Japanese language. It's 100% free, no registration required.

What are the differences when using ~なければならない and ~なくてはいけない, or their colloquial contracted forms ~なきゃ and ~なくちゃ when saying "must do"?

For example, what is the difference in the nuance and usage of the following "must eat" statements:

  • 食べなければならないよ。
  • 食べなくてはいけないよ。

Also, I found that ~なければいけない and ~なくてはならない also exist when searched on Google but are they also as commonly used as the first two? What are the differences?

share|improve this question
    
@Dave Great minds think alike huh? :P –  Lukman Aug 7 '11 at 5:57
4  
Can we add 食べないとならない/いけない/だめ to the list too? –  phirru Aug 7 '11 at 7:00
    
isn't ないと just the short form of なければ? –  Mark Hosang Aug 8 '11 at 3:29
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 12 down vote accepted

I had learnt the difference ages ago, but ha forgotten it since. I asked my friend Chie, and she said:

しなければいけない -> when you think that there's no other choice
しなければならない -> when you've been told to do it, or when it's rather a burden to you.

I think (as often) that looking at words can help. In the いけない proposition, you say basically that "you can't go forward", and that's quite subjective. In the ならない case, it rather seems that "it cannot be", which is independent from your will. There is a slight shift that may be a worthy nuance. However, I really doubt the average Japanese person distinguishes them in practice.

Also, しなければならない seems less colloquial than しなければいけない according to this, and other sources say that it is more used in legal documents.

Edit:

For the difference between なければ and なくては, I'd just use basic grammatical inference.

In the なくては, it's just a suspensive form (with a は for contrast, because you have a negation coming behind). Think of the positive version: "してよい", literally "I do this and it's good". You'd have a similar nuance: "I don't do that, it's bad". Quite a weak causal relation.

On the other hand, the えば form enforces a stronger relation, an "if" or a "when" that means that has this stronger implication nuance.

At least, that's how I understand it.

share|improve this answer
    
Your answer seems to jibe with what I had in mind (maybe I'll post later), but what about ~なければ vs ~なくては, which I believe the parts that directly derive the ~なきゃ and ~なくちゃ contracted forms? –  Lukman Aug 8 '11 at 3:25
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.