Take the 2-minute tour ×
Japanese Language Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for students, teachers, and linguists wanting to discuss the finer points of the Japanese language. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This question already has an answer here:

Is there any difference in meaning between 小さな and 小さい / 大きな and 大きい? I know that they have different syntactical rules, but semantically is there any difference? I was once told that 大きな was more appropriate for non-physical things, e.g. 大きな声.

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Earthliŋ, Dono, senshin, virmaior, snailboat Dec 27 '14 at 0:07

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

Shogakukan's Ruigo Reikai Thesaurus Dictionary has this to say about differences in meaning and usage:

「大きい」は、「夢が大きい」「大きく夢みる」のように述語として、また 連用修飾語としても使うが、「大きな」は「大きな…(名詞)」という言い方でしか使わない。
Ōkii is used as both predicate and as a continuative modifier as in yume ga ōkii, ōkiku yume miru, but ōkina is only used in the format of ōkina...(noun).

When modifying a noun to mean that a thing's degree or relevant scope is large, ōkina is used more often when the noun is abstract, such as a "problem" or "effect".

There's also a table indicating different valid and invalid constructions, which I've clumsily recreated below. The - indicates an invalid use, while the △ indicates an acceptable but less-common use.

            ~声 | 声が~ | ~問題に発展する | ~影響がある | ~拍手で迎えられる
大きい     〇 |    〇     |               △            |           △         |                〇
大きな     〇 |    -     |               〇           |           〇         |                〇

As shown above, both 大きい声 and 大きな声 would be equally valid. The person who told you that 大きな should be used more for non-physical things might have used the wrong word; given the description above, the distinction appears to be abstract vs. concrete, rather than physical vs. non-physical.

Grammatically, 小さい and 小さな have the same usage constraints as 大きい and 大きな. The thesaurus does not, however, mention any differences in abstract vs. concrete between 小さい and 小さな.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.