Take the 2-minute tour ×
Japanese Language Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for students, teachers, and linguists wanting to discuss the finer points of the Japanese language. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This is a loose follow-up of my first question here on JLSE. I tried to check gogen-allguide.com and 大辞林, but couldn't find anything definitive. Unfortunately I don't know any other resources for checking etymologies for (native) Japanese words.

So, my question is: What is the etymology of 宵【よい】? My guess would be 夜(よ)日(ひ).

share|improve this question
6  

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

Gogen Allguide and my dead-tree version of Shogakukan Kokugo Dai Jiten in JA mention that, in the Heian period and earlier, the terms for "evening, night" were somewhat specific, going in order:

  • ゆうべ
    Early evening
  • よい
    Late evening, early night: dusk
  • よなか
    Night
  • あかとき
    Pre-dawn
  • あけぼの
    Dawn

I can't find anything definitive at present about the derivation of 宵. I do note, however, that 夜日 is a separate word in its own right, yohi: "night and day, day and night." So that's probably not the source of 宵.

I do see that the older kana spelling was よひ. I note also that 夕 of similar meaning has an older kana spelling of ゆふ. I wonder then if these two might be cognate, with よひ representing some kind of inflection. Or, possibly, よひ might be the noun stem form of a hypothetical verb よふ, consisting of 夜 "night" + ふ "suffix indicating iterative or continuous action, or ongoing change". That said, I can't find evidence of any such verb in my sources to hand.


UPDATE:

The link to JStor that senshin added above in a comment previously didn't work for me, possibly due to net congestion or server trouble. I have since read through that paper by J Marshall Unger, New Etymologies for Some Japanese Time-Words. In it, he provides the following theory on page 40 for the derivation of modern 宵{よい}, ancient yopi (my additions in [square brackets] for clarity):

Because free native nouns in Old Japanese could begin with p but not r, the derivation of yopi 'evening twilight' is not as problematic as that of yoru, though by no means certain. It was probably a relatively late reduction of a whole phrase such as *yo pikari 'night shining', with the same *yo 'night' morpheme. According to pJ [proto-Japanese] non-final mid-vowel raising, an ancient compound of the form *yo-pi would have yielded OJ [Old Japanese] *yupi, not yopi, and OJ pi 'sun, day' was not used for 'light'.

I'm not sure what pJ non-final mid-vowel raising is beyond the summary provided by Unger (apparently outlined in more detail in a separate paper by Frellesvig and Whitman in 2004), but from the context of Unger's paper, I find myself unconvinced -- there are OJ terms that don't seem to exhibit this purported yo- > yu- shift. I'm also unconvinced that pikari would shorten to just pi, given that in all other contexts that I'm aware of, the shortest form is pika, though I am certainly open to some other term being the cognate source for the -pi in yopi.

share|improve this answer
    
I think we used to be notified when an answer to one of our questions was edited. Apparently, this feature was dropped. Anyway, thank you very much for your post, especially for your update. In the article it says "OJ pi 'sun, day'". Would 夜火 be another option, then? –  Earthliŋ May 31 at 21:30
1  
@Earthliŋ, Footnote 10 on page 40 of the article notes OJ *pwi 'fire; light' is a B-type* [i.e. 乙類] syllable. Unger also romanizes 甲類 i as i and 乙類 i as wi to make that distinction. So his rendering of yopi would imply 甲類 for pi here, and as such, 火 as an 乙類 would not be a likely candidate for reconstruction. –  Eiríkr Útlendi Jun 2 at 18:59
1  
As a side note, an additional reason for why I find yo pikari to be an unlikely source for yopi is that, in my own poking around in etymologies, ancient Japanese roots all appear to be, at most, two syllables. Pikari is the stem of verb pikaru, which itself might be decomposable as a compound of pi "sun, sunshine" + karu "to borrow". Although Unger states that OJ pi 'sun, day' was not used for 'light', the Man'yōshū uses 日 in ways that suggest that 日 was indeed used to mean 'sunlight, sunshine', c.f. poem #995. My understanding is that the Man'yōshū counts as OJ. –  Eiríkr Útlendi Jun 2 at 19:10

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.