Take the 2-minute tour ×
Japanese Language Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for students, teachers, and linguists wanting to discuss the finer points of the Japanese language. It's 100% free, no registration required.

What is the difference between 防ぐ and 予防する ?

To me both of them seem to mean "to prevent".
A Japanese person once explained to me how they are different but unfortunately I don't remember.

Similar question: What is the difference between 防止 and 予防?

share|improve this question

3 Answers 3

予防する = 予め防ぐ. 予 of 予防する means 予め(あらかじめ, in advance). So 予防する is to prevent in advance. Yes, the meaning of 防ぐ(prevent) itself includes the concept 'in advance', but 予防する emphasizes the meaning.

我々は火の手が広まらないように防いだ.(We prevented the fire from spreading. ) In this case, we don't say 予防した, because the fire actually happened already.

share|improve this answer

There's a little more nuance to it than one being 'in advance,' I think. 予防 is used in limited situations to refer to prevention of certain medical or natural disasters, usually referring to preventive measures taken to protect against fire, or something like vaccinations to prevent illness. If you check this dictionary entry for 予防 you get a single, specific answer:

病気や災害などが生じないように注意し、前もって防ぐこと。
「火災を―する」「―措置」

To translate, it refers to advance prevention, as we see in 予, but it specifically refers to things like illness and natural disasters.

The definitions for 防ぐ on the other hand are rather varied and have much more of a physical nuance of preventing something on the outside from getting inside something, much more in the sense of defense rather than in prevention. Indeed, prevention can be seen as an advance defense, but 防ぐ is more about the act of keeping something out rather than the action as a meditated action in regard to an anticipated event.

To steal a few examples from that dictionary entry: 「敵の猛攻を―・ぐ」「外敵の侵入を―・ぐ」「冷たい北風を―・ぐ」「西日を―・ぐ」

Apparently one of the definitions allows for a similar meaning to 予防, as in here:

(3)悪いことが起ころうとするのを、あらかじめ手段を講じてくいとめる。防止する。
「病害虫の発生を―・ぐ」「事故を未然に―・ぐ」

But the dictionary itself defines it as 防止 rather than 予防, which is basically the difference between "halt/stop from happening" and "take early defensive action."

share|improve this answer

Sorry to be perhaps a little obvious, but isn't the difference that one is a verb and the other is a noun made into a verb, where the difference in grammatical construct carries its own nuance?

In English we can do a similar thing with the root word "prevent". We can either use it as a noun, "a prevention (against...)", or we can use it as a verb, "to prevent (something...)".

する isn't exactly "enact", but 予防する would translate to me as "enact a prevention" against something happening, whereas 防ぐ is simply "to prevent". It's like the difference between "going for a run" and "going running". Or 散歩する and 歩く, to use a Japanese example. Same meaning, different nuance. Using the verb simply names an action with open ended parameters, using the noun delineates that activity as a more specific task with known and set parameters.

Bottom line is that I think they do mean the same thing, the difference only lies in the nuance that exists any time you choose between a verb or noun-made-verb.

share|improve this answer
    
The downvote is probably just a troll, since they offer no explanation, but if there's actually anything objectively wrong with my answer, the cool thing to do would be to let me know so I can learn from it. –  Questioner Jul 11 '13 at 8:10
    
I think there is more to it than just verb versus noun. To me 予防 has a sense of anticipation. While 防ぐ is just defending. –  Flaw Jul 16 '13 at 13:53
    
@Flaw: I think the same thing could be said about "enacting a prevention", which implies anticipating future problems, and "preventing" which implies an in the moment action. I guess my answer is going to be unpopular, but so far I'm not seeing much to convince me that it's definitively wrong. I think any time people ask "what's the difference between...", people tend to overstate what are slight subjective personal takes. –  Questioner Jul 16 '13 at 16:24
1  
Apparently this anonymous downvoter struck every answer here so don't take it personally I guess. –  ssb Jul 16 '13 at 16:32

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.